From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
kdevops@lists.linux.dev, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz
Subject: Re: ext4 v6.15-rc2 baseline
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2025 18:34:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250416233415.GA3779528@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z__vQcCF9xovbwtT@bombadil.infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1441 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:56:17AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> ext4 developers,
>
> kdevops has run fstests on v6.15-rc2 across the different ext4 profiles
> it currently defines, and the results are below.
Hmm, there are quite a lot of failures that aren't in my baseline. In
particular, I work very hard to make sure the 4k profile is clean, and
as you can see in the attached file, it is. But here's a short
summary (for the full set, including the versions used for the full
test run, see the attached file.)
ext4/4k: 587 tests, 55 skipped, 5340 seconds
ext4/1k: 581 tests, 59 skipped, 5700 seconds
ext4/ext3: 579 tests, 1 failures, 149 skipped, 4715 seconds
Failures: ext4/028
ext4/encrypt: 562 tests, 175 skipped, 2982 seconds
ext4/nojournal: 579 tests, 127 skipped, 3955 seconds
...
I'll have to take a look at your test results tarball (I assume it
includes the NNN.out.bad and NNN.full files, right) to see what's
going on.
There are some exclude files[1][2] which I use to reduce noise, but
that doesn't seem to explain many of your failures that you have reported.
[1] https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/test-appliance/files/root/fs/global_exclude
[2] https://github.com/tytso/xfstests-bld/blob/master/test-appliance/files/root/fs/ext4/exclude
> - Is this useful information?
Maybe; the question is why are your results so different from my results.
- Ted
[-- Attachment #2: ext4-baseline-6.15-rc2 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2101 bytes --]
TESTRUNID: ltm-20250414133140
KERNEL: kernel 6.15.0-rc2-xfstests #22 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Apr 14 12:18:46 EDT 2025 x86_64
CMDLINE: --kernel gs://gce-xfstests/kernel.deb -c ext4/all -g auto
CPUS: 2
MEM: 7680
ext4/4k: 587 tests, 55 skipped, 5340 seconds
ext4/1k: 581 tests, 59 skipped, 5700 seconds
ext4/ext3: 579 tests, 1 failures, 149 skipped, 4715 seconds
Failures: ext4/028
ext4/encrypt: 562 tests, 175 skipped, 2982 seconds
ext4/nojournal: 579 tests, 127 skipped, 3955 seconds
ext4/ext3conv: 584 tests, 57 skipped, 5164 seconds
ext4/adv: 580 tests, 2 failures, 63 skipped, 4873 seconds
Failures: generic/757 generic/764
ext4/dioread_nolock: 585 tests, 55 skipped, 5538 seconds
ext4/data_journal: 592 tests, 8 failures, 1 errors, 135 skipped, 4464 seconds
Failures: generic/127
Flaky: generic/032: 20% (1/5) generic/475: 40% (2/5)
Errors: generic/475
ext4/bigalloc_4k: 558 tests, 1 failures, 58 skipped, 5128 seconds
Flaky: generic/234: 20% (1/5)
ext4/bigalloc_1k: 559 tests, 69 skipped, 4965 seconds
ext4/dax: 571 tests, 2 failures, 160 skipped, 3111 seconds
Failures: generic/344 generic/363
Totals: 6941 tests, 1162 skipped, 34 failures, 1 errors, 52426s
FSTESTIMG: gce-xfstests/xfstests-amd64-202504110828
FSTESTPRJ: gce-xfstests
FSTESTVER: blktests 236edfd (Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:56:26 +0900)
FSTESTVER: fio fio-3.39 (Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:36:57 -0700)
FSTESTVER: fsverity v1.6-2-gee7d74d (Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:41:58 -0800)
FSTESTVER: ima-evm-utils v1.5 (Mon, 6 Mar 2023 07:40:07 -0500)
FSTESTVER: libaio libaio-0.3.108-82-gb8eadc9 (Thu, 2 Jun 2022 13:33:11 +0200)
FSTESTVER: ltp 20250130-195-ge2bbba0c1 (Fri, 11 Apr 2025 18:06:15 +0800)
FSTESTVER: quota v4.05-69-g68952f1 (Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:45:56 -0400)
FSTESTVER: util-linux v2.41 (Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:50:51 +0100)
FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v6.13.0-2-gf0d16c9e (Tue, 1 Apr 2025 20:23:42 -0400)
FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld 42bcd9aa (Wed, 9 Apr 2025 07:51:57 -0400)
FSTESTVER: xfstests v2025.03.30-11-g344015670 (Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:50:06 -0400)
FSTESTVER: zz_build-distro bookworm
FSTESTSET: -g auto
FSTESTOPT: aex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-16 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-16 17:56 ext4 v6.15-rc2 baseline Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-16 23:34 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2025-04-17 16:38 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-17 18:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-04-17 20:56 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-19 18:22 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-04-21 15:54 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-21 16:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-04-21 16:47 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-04-17 16:49 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-04-17 20:35 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-18 1:42 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-18 3:56 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-04-18 19:08 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-19 18:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-04-20 3:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250416233415.GA3779528@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kdevops@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox