From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AE754C85; Thu, 1 May 2025 04:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746073912; cv=none; b=MuwVguqV/dRLRcSAmT2SfAZ6JuGjVdDiSKsqm3W8b4N8IWofVfY+kHYVExiFgcEvdjWsa9vG1NSf4wczdTpE95SEsCtlF4GPkqIpBVSMPnRtcVEzSrkdJtu7o2UOeP8m1mvxT/NY84j3LEfC95KYGHXcJ5OhjpYlVgLmMaT4qos= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746073912; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZDNOHwwoAJLUr3IglTZ4hdSkQXIS1WA8o0QxHP5PN1M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=SP9kn3wUQg5dQNCQSapHTGucBtXuDa2OXe0rQ/aXkPnpl97r9ETYsdgBXRPUcus4XBeVU/ZVY5J2ZUp3EfThZdHXCcgIs77kXuWDOedXC4gRCC97EZwRrGgRo5T3WJHe+CKY4DqMg286CrHyo/aDt09Hh77k68OZmftWhnaor8U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=tFJLQ49L; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="tFJLQ49L" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF9B8C4CEE3; Thu, 1 May 2025 04:31:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746073911; bh=ZDNOHwwoAJLUr3IglTZ4hdSkQXIS1WA8o0QxHP5PN1M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tFJLQ49LIWnXzJdisjZQ5wh1eua1xlS9w9mPEo4juI8L2W1kIDtBaFVQor53O6F9P fAn9oNYkspleX9oGaKCWAFq+84+RPDGncE3wlV+5UznkIu8LXDdPmJJ4QUHf0dVfiz uQmzmQg0wWIqRdajTJVEWubyzIk/Yu4BinByMGLgFqhM8nG9vpxasPXbSIU0lWbbGA 65Q+yQGK6j1AFLixplo68CKnDP0qlpL7JT1xviSv68a6jUatDhenHtgp5+den8ILw6 ce45e5tI3PNwTo0gHyWSQPCDTa9rS8iNvJTKaQ+2H7sdFjxZPABkyX4AhGdbGTMw2T IawbhBPm6CNIw== Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 21:31:51 -0700 From: "Darrick J. Wong" To: John Garry Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dchinner@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, catherine.hoang@oracle.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, cem@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/15] large atomic writes for xfs Message-ID: <20250501043151.GE1035866@frogsfrogsfrogs> References: <20250425164504.3263637-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com> <972bd2fc-4dc9-42d5-ab05-dab29fd0e444@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <972bd2fc-4dc9-42d5-ab05-dab29fd0e444@oracle.com> On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 03:14:04PM +0100, John Garry wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > At this point, is your only issue now with > 05/15 xfs: ignore HW which cannot atomic write a single block > ? > > I am not sure on 15/15... This series still needs reviews of patches 2, 3, 5, and 15, if I'm not mistaken. --D > Thanks, > John >