From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] ext4: remove sb argument from ext4_superblock_csum()
Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 22:38:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250513053809.699974-3-ebiggers@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513053809.699974-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Since ext4_superblock_csum() no longer uses its sb argument, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 3 +--
fs/ext4/ioctl.c | 4 ++--
fs/ext4/resize.c | 2 +-
fs/ext4/super.c | 9 ++++-----
4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 5c7a86acbf79..25221c6693b0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -3116,12 +3116,11 @@ extern int ext4_read_bh(struct buffer_head *bh, blk_opf_t op_flags,
bh_end_io_t *end_io, bool simu_fail);
extern int ext4_read_bh_lock(struct buffer_head *bh, blk_opf_t op_flags, bool wait);
extern void ext4_sb_breadahead_unmovable(struct super_block *sb, sector_t block);
extern int ext4_seq_options_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset);
extern int ext4_calculate_overhead(struct super_block *sb);
-extern __le32 ext4_superblock_csum(struct super_block *sb,
- struct ext4_super_block *es);
+extern __le32 ext4_superblock_csum(struct ext4_super_block *es);
extern void ext4_superblock_csum_set(struct super_block *sb);
extern int ext4_alloc_flex_bg_array(struct super_block *sb,
ext4_group_t ngroup);
extern const char *ext4_decode_error(struct super_block *sb, int errno,
char nbuf[16]);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
index 6b99284095bf..c05eb0efbb95 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ioctl.c
@@ -141,19 +141,19 @@ static int ext4_update_backup_sb(struct super_block *sb,
}
es = (struct ext4_super_block *) (bh->b_data + offset);
lock_buffer(bh);
if (ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb) &&
- es->s_checksum != ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es)) {
+ es->s_checksum != ext4_superblock_csum(es)) {
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "Invalid checksum for backup "
"superblock %llu", sb_block);
unlock_buffer(bh);
goto out_bh;
}
func(es, arg);
if (ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb))
- es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es);
+ es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(es);
set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
unlock_buffer(bh);
if (handle) {
err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, NULL, bh);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c
index b7ff0d955f0d..050f26168d97 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -1117,11 +1117,11 @@ static inline void ext4_set_block_group_nr(struct super_block *sb, char *data,
{
struct ext4_super_block *es = (struct ext4_super_block *) data;
es->s_block_group_nr = cpu_to_le16(group);
if (ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb))
- es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es);
+ es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(es);
}
/*
* Update the backup copies of the ext4 metadata. These don't need to be part
* of the main resize transaction, because e2fsck will re-write them if there
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index d7780269b455..14e47cc2a5a3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -284,12 +284,11 @@ static int ext4_verify_csum_type(struct super_block *sb,
return 1;
return es->s_checksum_type == EXT4_CRC32C_CHKSUM;
}
-__le32 ext4_superblock_csum(struct super_block *sb,
- struct ext4_super_block *es)
+__le32 ext4_superblock_csum(struct ext4_super_block *es)
{
int offset = offsetof(struct ext4_super_block, s_checksum);
__u32 csum;
csum = ext4_chksum(~0, (char *)es, offset);
@@ -301,21 +300,21 @@ static int ext4_superblock_csum_verify(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_super_block *es)
{
if (!ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb))
return 1;
- return es->s_checksum == ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es);
+ return es->s_checksum == ext4_superblock_csum(es);
}
void ext4_superblock_csum_set(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
if (!ext4_has_feature_metadata_csum(sb))
return;
- es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es);
+ es->s_checksum = ext4_superblock_csum(es);
}
ext4_fsblk_t ext4_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
struct ext4_group_desc *bg)
{
@@ -5913,11 +5912,11 @@ static struct file *ext4_get_journal_blkdev(struct super_block *sb,
goto out_bh;
}
if ((le32_to_cpu(es->s_feature_ro_compat) &
EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM) &&
- es->s_checksum != ext4_superblock_csum(sb, es)) {
+ es->s_checksum != ext4_superblock_csum(es)) {
ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "external journal has corrupt superblock");
errno = -EFSCORRUPTED;
goto out_bh;
}
--
2.49.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 5:38 [PATCH 0/4] ext4,jbd2: clean up unused arguments to checksum functions Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 5:38 ` [PATCH 1/4] ext4: remove sbi argument from ext4_chksum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 6:13 ` Baokun Li
2025-05-13 5:38 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-05-13 6:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] ext4: remove sb argument from ext4_superblock_csum() Baokun Li
2025-05-13 5:38 ` [PATCH 3/4] jbd2: remove journal_t argument from jbd2_chksum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 6:19 ` Baokun Li
2025-05-13 5:38 ` [PATCH 4/4] jbd2: remove journal_t argument from jbd2_superblock_csum() Eric Biggers
2025-05-13 6:21 ` Baokun Li
2025-05-20 14:40 ` [PATCH 0/4] ext4,jbd2: clean up unused arguments to checksum functions Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250513053809.699974-3-ebiggers@kernel.org \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox