From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDA32ED172; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:53:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755096820; cv=none; b=DSN/vdtUu7wr8hDOBVP0PC3iFQjyd86cAyyEwJjGO12U/+g1HtsHUU0SGkvKUQdnNtxtcfCBI3eEzpisRK7WhY/acXos0kCv+WdgkJ2jec5inn/HPY1ivczgdxy9phEDjkYcVb8pnxCF4SjK4sHiTjBU70V9UaxD3oy3wmLUScA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755096820; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qsIzK3FQVmuwp376IvkIc7QaQl0+eKfxluiwZGuycJo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=WZ3tVzIvFop5D3B/m+I6cSiU8NNj7+PkYbg3EU/Shx+VPFS4AlyWroREbvOK3Y1ZbOphZjZarRuSb3OT4ZzTOi/1ooYWK3YCAPjDJWkFuebfzR/z9BEiKU7zUE4P4k52bymd7cytIQucchg7Zx3AeqEQ4nkQjtt0c+J1CDVmMx0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=h9Z1b9Dh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="h9Z1b9Dh" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 933ADC4CEEB; Wed, 13 Aug 2025 14:53:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1755096820; bh=qsIzK3FQVmuwp376IvkIc7QaQl0+eKfxluiwZGuycJo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=h9Z1b9DhPWIV6cS+bkMlZk/eNbU+HdGphYtWJcvDnCd4mHNW6LGz0PAzq4S3sz/bQ Qu6Q/zr1uSLN9QG07lhIO8zKvSK3b5B2d7wMCY+FxzL+PtVIheklfnv+CxHDBiqwKK HH28jaOUNKO4S5N8tA/MsLvV3/5lSRVuQ5L0TQBQ= Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 16:53:37 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, broonie@kernel.org, achill@achill.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Arnd Bergmann , Dan Carpenter , Anders Roxell , Ben Copeland , LTP List , chrubis , Petr Vorel , Ian Rogers , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Yi , Joseph Qi , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4 , Zhang Yi , Theodore Ts'o , Baokun Li Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/627] 6.16.1-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025081311-purifier-reviver-aeb2@gregkh> References: <20250812173419.303046420@linuxfoundation.org> <2025081300-frown-sketch-f5bd@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 08:01:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > Hi Greg, > > > > 2) > > > > > > The following list of LTP syscalls failure noticed on qemu-arm64 with > > > stable-rc 6.16.1-rc1 with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y build configuration. > > > > > > Most failures report ENOSPC (28) or mkswap errors, which may be related > > > to disk space handling in the 64K page configuration on qemu-arm64. > > > > > > The issue is reproducible on multiple runs. > > > > > > * qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls - 64K page size test failures list, > > > > > > - fallocate04 > > > - fallocate05 > > > - fdatasync03 > > > - fsync01 > > > - fsync04 > > > - ioctl_fiemap01 > > > - swapoff01 > > > - swapoff02 > > > - swapon01 > > > - swapon02 > > > - swapon03 > > > - sync01 > > > - sync_file_range02 > > > - syncfs01 > > > > > > Reproducibility: > > > - 64K config above listed test fails > > > - 4K config above listed test pass. > > > > > > Regression Analysis: > > > - New regression? yes > > > > Regression from 6.16? Or just from 6.15.y? > > Based on available data, the issue is not present in v6.16 or v6.15. > > Anders, bisected this regression and found, > > ext4: correct the reserved credits for extent conversion > [ Upstream commit 95ad8ee45cdbc321c135a2db895d48b374ef0f87 ] > > Report lore link, > > https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CA+G9fYtBnCSa2zkaCn-oZKYz8jz5FZj0HS7DjSfMeamq3AXqNg@mail.gmail.com/ Great, and that's also affecting 6.17-rc1 so we are "bug compatible"? :) thanks greg k-h