From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D5ED23815C; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755185736; cv=none; b=EAXvtYtPQsX1iLm+u0/cxxnU0LRC2rF5QME/4MYZcqUGxRiilSxmUoS4+YObqHWqDnk+CSsoJa66X/j/haNqJbfrVWBbDFzyKVMXzfW60vw6JGBhVUL2SC8uzan8Cz1N9vUHRICqhh8ah5hdzvE5btftRP4HLDI3BWotfnAGIbA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755185736; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gDxvjWIgXlyBLWgV2QQr23LJcSGf4vc5YOroiJL6BHQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=V5NHdUvoZB8y+WseKQCF9GzQ12L08R3VHewug8rMhQ0E9KeBmB2i9t7yhulllCAa6V4q4zJaH1itjWNHM5KNW2f7bC0M0OzmLbsbDXJUWyCG4n6OJZ+iN57e9yCqZ48YMRqNilJMgYDfiwDuCmYwSF2kKAa64tjuPoJKip4CzJU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=DJNPGlis; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="DJNPGlis" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2644BC4CEED; Thu, 14 Aug 2025 15:35:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1755185735; bh=gDxvjWIgXlyBLWgV2QQr23LJcSGf4vc5YOroiJL6BHQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DJNPGlisvjw88EiXwDk2RuS15vYBkAcU5305MBsWPMCbM6/W7E4E6L+9JlKljpuRX zwzpCawOznOaYHkMchEhfqmMwpvf3R8wIoHWBbG1N63zmB6JfoOL8GnfoT0t/6j8PQ QQbPrxKsabXo4dWZwuKLd92OEcSIPH/lHm05gpHI= Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:35:32 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Naresh Kamboju Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org, hargar@microsoft.com, achill@achill.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Arnd Bergmann , Dan Carpenter , Anders Roxell , Ben Copeland , LTP List , chrubis , Petr Vorel , Ian Rogers , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Yi , Joseph Qi , Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4 Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.16 000/627] 6.16.1-rc1 review Message-ID: <2025081416-wing-bakery-3205@gregkh> References: <20250812173419.303046420@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 07:11:05PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2025 at 18:21, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 05:46:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 at 23:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > > > The following list of LTP syscalls failure noticed on qemu-arm64 with > > > stable-rc 6.16.1-rc1 with CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES=y build configuration. > > > > > > Most failures report ENOSPC (28) or mkswap errors, which may be related > > > to disk space handling in the 64K page configuration on qemu-arm64. > > > > > > The issue is reproducible on multiple runs. > > > > > > * qemu-arm64, ltp-syscalls - 64K page size test failures list, > > > > > > - fallocate04 > > > - fallocate05 > > > - fdatasync03 > > > - fsync01 > > > - fsync04 > > > - ioctl_fiemap01 > > > - swapoff01 > > > - swapoff02 > > > - swapon01 > > > - swapon02 > > > - swapon03 > > > - sync01 > > > - sync_file_range02 > > > - syncfs01 > > These test failures are not seen on Linus tree v6.16 or v6.15. > > > > > I'm also seeing epoll_ctl04 failing on Raspberry Pi 4, there's a bisect > > still running but I suspect given the error message: > > Right ! > LTP syscalls epoll_ctl04 test is failing on Linux mainline as well > with this error on LKFT CI system on several platforms. > > > > > epoll_ctl04.c:59: TFAIL: epoll_ctl(..., EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ...) with number of nesting is 5 expected EINVAL: ELOOP (40) > > > > that it might be: > > > > # bad: [b47ce23d38c737a2f84af2b18c5e6b6e09e4932d] eventpoll: Fix semi-unbounded recursion > > > > which already got tested, or something adjacent. > > A patch has been proposed to update the LTP test case to align with > recent changes in the Linux kernel code. > > [LTP] [PATCH] syscalls/epoll_ctl04: add ELOOP to expected errnos > > -https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/39ee7abdee12e22074b40d46775d69d37725b932.1754386027.git.jstancek@redhat.com/ Great, thanks for letting us know that this is just a test-case issue. greg k-h