public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	 kernel-team@fb.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,  viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/50] fs: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING from fs-writeback.c
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 13:46:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250825-tassen-saugt-7fb4b5909be1@brauner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ce42c8d0da7647e98a7dc3b704d19b57e60b71d.1755806649.git.josef@toxicpanda.com>

On Thu, Aug 21, 2025 at 04:18:46PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Now that we have the reference count to indicate live inodes, we can
> remove all of the uses of I_WILL_FREE and I_FREEING in fs-writeback.c
> and use the appropriate reference count checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
> ---

Very nice change and it will be even better without the plain accesses
to i_count. ;)

>  fs/fs-writeback.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 789c4228412c..0ea6d0e86791 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode,
>  {
>  	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
>  	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&inode->i_count));
>  
>  	if (list_empty(&inode->i_io_list))
>  		iobj_get(inode);
> @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ static void inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(struct inode *inode,
>  {
>  	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
>  	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&inode->i_count));
>  
>  	inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC_QUEUED;
>  	if (wb != &wb->bdi->wb)
> @@ -415,10 +415,10 @@ static bool inode_do_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode,
>  	xa_lock_irq(&mapping->i_pages);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Once I_FREEING or I_WILL_FREE are visible under i_lock, the eviction
> -	 * path owns the inode and we shouldn't modify ->i_io_list.
> +	 * Once the refcount is 0, the eviction path owns the inode and we
> +	 * shouldn't modify ->i_io_list.
>  	 */
> -	if (unlikely(inode->i_state & (I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)))
> +	if (unlikely(!refcount_read(&inode->i_count)))
>  		goto skip_switch;
>  
>  	trace_inode_switch_wbs(inode, old_wb, new_wb);
> @@ -570,13 +570,16 @@ static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
>  	/* while holding I_WB_SWITCH, no one else can update the association */
>  	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>  	if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & SB_ACTIVE) ||
> -	    inode->i_state & (I_WB_SWITCH | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE) ||
> +	    inode->i_state & I_WB_SWITCH ||
>  	    inode_to_wb(inode) == new_wb) {
>  		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>  		return false;
>  	}
> +	if (!inode_tryget(inode)) {
> +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +		return false;
> +	}
>  	inode->i_state |= I_WB_SWITCH;
> -	__iget(inode);
>  	spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>  
>  	return true;
> @@ -1207,7 +1210,7 @@ static void inode_cgwb_move_to_attached(struct inode *inode,
>  {
>  	assert_spin_locked(&wb->list_lock);
>  	assert_spin_locked(&inode->i_lock);
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(inode->i_state & I_FREEING);
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!refcount_read(&inode->i_count));
>  
>  	inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC_QUEUED;
>  	inode_delete_from_io_list(inode);
> @@ -1405,7 +1408,7 @@ static void redirty_tail_locked(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb)
>  	 * tracking. Flush worker will ignore this inode anyway and it will
>  	 * trigger assertions in inode_io_list_move_locked().
>  	 */
> -	if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING) {
> +	if (!refcount_read(&inode->i_count)) {
>  		inode_delete_from_io_list(inode);
>  		wb_io_lists_depopulated(wb);
>  		return;
> @@ -1621,7 +1624,7 @@ static void requeue_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>  			  struct writeback_control *wbc,
>  			  unsigned long dirtied_before)
>  {
> -	if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING)
> +	if (!refcount_read(&inode->i_count))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -1787,7 +1790,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
>   * whether it is a data-integrity sync (%WB_SYNC_ALL) or not (%WB_SYNC_NONE).
>   *
>   * To prevent the inode from going away, either the caller must have a reference
> - * to the inode, or the inode must have I_WILL_FREE or I_FREEING set.
> + * to the inode, or the inode must have a zero refcount.
>   */
>  static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
>  				  struct writeback_control *wbc)
> @@ -1797,9 +1800,7 @@ static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
>  
>  	spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
>  	if (!refcount_read(&inode->i_count))
> -		WARN_ON(!(inode->i_state & (I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING)));
> -	else
> -		WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
> +		WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_NEW);
>  
>  	if (inode->i_state & I_SYNC) {
>  		/*
> @@ -1837,7 +1838,7 @@ static int writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
>  	 * If the inode is freeing, its i_io_list shoudn't be updated
>  	 * as it can be finally deleted at this moment.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
> +	if (refcount_read(&inode->i_count)) {
>  		/*
>  		 * If the inode is now fully clean, then it can be safely
>  		 * removed from its writeback list (if any). Otherwise the
> @@ -1957,7 +1958,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
>  		 * kind writeout is handled by the freer.
>  		 */
>  		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -		if (inode->i_state & (I_NEW | I_FREEING | I_WILL_FREE)) {
> +		if ((inode->i_state & I_NEW) || !refcount_read(&inode->i_count)) {
>  			redirty_tail_locked(inode, wb);
>  			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>  			continue;
> @@ -2615,7 +2616,7 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *inode, int flags)
>  			if (inode_unhashed(inode))
>  				goto out_unlock;
>  		}
> -		if (inode->i_state & I_FREEING)
> +		if (!refcount_read(&inode->i_count))
>  			goto out_unlock;
>  
>  		/*
> @@ -2729,13 +2730,17 @@ static void wait_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb)
>  		spin_unlock_irq(&sb->s_inode_wblist_lock);
>  
>  		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> -		if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) {
> +		if (inode->i_state & I_NEW) {
> +			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> +			spin_lock_irq(&sb->s_inode_wblist_lock);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!inode_tryget(inode)) {
>  			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> -
>  			spin_lock_irq(&sb->s_inode_wblist_lock);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> -		__iget(inode);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * We could have potentially ended up on the cached LRU list, so
> @@ -2886,7 +2891,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sync_inodes_sb);
>   * This function commits an inode to disk immediately if it is dirty. This is
>   * primarily needed by knfsd.
>   *
> - * The caller must either have a ref on the inode or must have set I_WILL_FREE.
> + * The caller must either have a ref on the inode or the inode must have a zero refcount.
>   */
>  int write_inode_now(struct inode *inode, int sync)
>  {
> -- 
> 2.49.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25 11:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-21 20:18 [PATCH 00/50] fs: rework inode reference counting Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 01/50] fs: add an i_obj_count refcount to the inode Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 02/50] fs: make the i_state flags an enum Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 11:08   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-22 13:31     ` Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 14:36     ` David Sterba
2025-08-22 11:18   ` Sun YangKai
2025-08-22 11:42     ` [PATCH 02/50] " Alan Huang
2025-08-22 12:11       ` Sun YangKai
2025-08-22 14:40     ` [PATCH 02/50] fs: " Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 03/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference in wait_sb_inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 04/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference for the i_wb_list Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 11:27   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 05/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference for the i_io_list Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 06/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference in writeback_sb_inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 12:20   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 07/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference while on the hashtable Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 08/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference while on the LRU list Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 09/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count reference while on the sb inode list Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 10/50] fs: stop accessing ->i_count directly in f2fs and gfs2 Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 12:38   ` (subset) " Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 11/50] fs: hold an i_obj_count when we have an i_count reference Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 12/50] fs: rework iput logic Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 12:54   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 13/50] fs: add an I_LRU flag to the inode Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 14/50] fs: maintain a list of pinned inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 14:55   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 15/50] fs: delete the inode from the LRU list on lookup Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 15:27   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 16/50] fs: change evict_inodes to use iput instead of evict directly Josef Bacik
2025-08-25  9:07   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-25 19:35     ` Josef Bacik
2025-08-26  9:56       ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 17/50] fs: hold a full ref while the inode is on a LRU Josef Bacik
2025-08-25  9:20   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-25 10:40     ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 18/50] fs: disallow 0 reference count inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 10:54   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-25 19:26     ` Josef Bacik
2025-08-26  9:28       ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 19/50] fs: make evict_inodes add to the dispose list under the i_lock Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 20/50] fs: convert i_count to refcount_t Josef Bacik
2025-08-22 12:10   ` Amir Goldstein
2025-08-22 13:56   ` kernel test robot
2025-08-25 11:03   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 21/50] fs: use refcount_inc_not_zero in igrab Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:21   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 22/50] fs: use inode_tryget in find_inode* Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:26   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 23/50] fs: update find_inode_*rcu to check the i_count count Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:27   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 24/50] fs: use igrab in insert_inode_locked Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 25/50] fs: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING check from __inode_add_lru Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 26/50] fs: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING check in inode_pin_lru_isolating Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 27/50] fs: use inode_tryget in evict_inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:43   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-25 18:22     ` Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 28/50] fs: change evict_dentries_for_decrypted_inodes to use refcount Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 29/50] block: use igrab in sync_bdevs Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 30/50] bcachefs: use the refcount instead of I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 31/50] btrfs: don't check I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 32/50] fs: use igrab in drop_pagecache_sb Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 33/50] fs: stop checking I_FREEING in d_find_alias_rcu Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 34/50] ext4: stop checking I_WILL_FREE|IFREEING in ext4_check_map_extents_env Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 35/50] fs: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING from fs-writeback.c Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:46   ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 36/50] gfs2: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING usage Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 37/50] fs: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING check from dquot.c Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 38/50] notify: remove I_WILL_FREE|I_FREEING checks in fsnotify_unmount_inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 39/50] xfs: remove I_FREEING check Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 40/50] landlock: remove I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE check Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 41/50] fs: change inode_is_dirtytime_only to use refcount Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 42/50] btrfs: remove references to I_FREEING Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 43/50] ext4: remove reference to I_FREEING in inode.c Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 44/50] ext4: remove reference to I_FREEING in orphan.c Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 45/50] pnfs: use i_count refcount to determine if the inode is going away Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 46/50] fs: remove some spurious I_FREEING references in inode.c Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 47/50] xfs: remove reference to I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:18 ` [PATCH 48/50] ocfs2: do not set I_WILL_FREE Josef Bacik
2025-08-21 20:19 ` [PATCH 49/50] fs: remove I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:53   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-21 20:19 ` [PATCH 50/50] fs: add documentation explaining the reference count rules for inodes Josef Bacik
2025-08-25 11:56   ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-22 10:51 ` [PATCH 00/50] fs: rework inode reference counting Christian Brauner
2025-08-22 13:30   ` Josef Bacik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250825-tassen-saugt-7fb4b5909be1@brauner \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox