From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B07DB1D79BE; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757081279; cv=none; b=IlOOOb7mMY1AtkXLgGeAjXSo1KZtd+hNKnmjVqLNISrzDw9sFlWqdV5yC8wBkhQX47+8lIProw0nsG332tassNFrTGtoumToJYN8BqDx9GCnROZFTFByxlk7BpvR2oDOoZY6sU2unj1j12+ANrdMdNQ8ZNxGC5mTIKbLCMKq6Dw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757081279; c=relaxed/simple; bh=D7ilWtLEL/M8Lnilo8+XiVASUwlDJivUteumgIELcp8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kR2AzYU+Wo47qWVUoDqwpRuWCMdTwT1AF2MEBiUvic9XjgS5nwqBWwjCgldA8OK2NwynGKirOfgf1YXw5zOttLJhVpKs7w6CRl+7cLh+0Khj5VAQassd4JFHrdqnFfFme9YnOfqz31nNWg6LIdB1eV8cN6jliN5YxzmhXhrDjF4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dac1A/TQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dac1A/TQ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 98653C4CEF1; Fri, 5 Sep 2025 14:07:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1757081279; bh=D7ilWtLEL/M8Lnilo8+XiVASUwlDJivUteumgIELcp8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dac1A/TQgJlddaHi2gJ+rrhAuU80FHe55XD4QfoZ15+ClY3eFPbaAyU2t7ByT8JkR o/daTTD0TNQxvvaLJ7IJYtC8e50o4QhZjpkixx4gEgi5oqs2w5CxSNcYhkwd2hyHve 6n6ekWRvVpukPKJLVYusFjGby5MUx+2xtxrn0n6wMmtLYbQeXFYJtCVB9n4irE4T8K ny1MjcZm4jfRKPYzLsWb3lxUbmV528sQIRQJ57uRYPkIeYadn2o5hBgq95reM4nZGf /fL2pAFgI+4ezpDnvv1xH1SBle3rNM5CqeEuoU+SjNpYJglpzlo14M0PNujWb0dXyV 8h9IxMjCLtBeQ== Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2025 16:07:54 +0200 From: Christian Brauner To: Mateusz Guzik Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, josef@toxicpanda.com, kernel-team@fb.com, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [WIP RFC PATCH] fs: retire I_WILL_FREE Message-ID: <20250905-frohe-anbinden-0af1a85f11ab@brauner> References: <20250902145428.456510-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250902145428.456510-1-mjguzik@gmail.com> > For the life of me I could not figure out if write_inode_now() is legal > to call in ->evict_inode later and have no means to test, so I devised a Welcome to our meticulously documented and simultaneously self-explanatory codebase.