From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Ranganath V N <vnranganath.20@gmail.com>
Cc: lkp@intel.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
david.hunter.linux@gmail.com, khalid@kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs: ext4: fix uninitialized symbols
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 15:07:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251012190731.GF354523@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251011063830.47485-1-vnranganath.20@gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 12:08:29PM +0530, Ranganath V N wrote:
> Fix the issue detected by the smatch tool.
>
> fs/ext4/inode.c:3583 ext4_map_blocks_atomic_write_slow() error: uninitialized symbol 'next_pblk'.
This one is valid, and I agree with your proposed changed. (Although
the worst that will happen is that in case of an ENOSPC error comined
with a corrpted file system the warning message may print an
uninitialized value. So not a big eal, but we might as well fix it.)
> fs/ext4/namei.c:1776 ext4_lookup() error: uninitialized symbol 'de'.
This is a false positive for smatch. There isn't actualy a prolem
here, because all of these funtions are calling ext4_find_entry() or
ext4_lookup_entry(), and the callers will not try to dereference the
pointer passed into *res_dir ('de') if the function has either
returned NULL or an ERR_PTR(), and that's in fact correct.
I don't especially mind the fix (but I do wish smatch could be
smarter). Out of curiosity, if we move the *res_dir = NULL from
__ext4_find_entry() and move it so it's unconditionally set in
ext4_find_entry() and ext4_lookup_entry(), is that sufficient to make
smatch stop complaining?
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-12 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-08 17:16 [PATCH] fs: ext4: fix uninitialized symbols Ranganath V N
2025-10-10 18:31 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-10 18:41 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-11 6:38 ` [PATCH v2] " Ranganath V N
2025-10-12 19:07 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2025-11-06 15:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-10-11 7:48 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251012190731.GF354523@mit.edu \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=khalid@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=vnranganath.20@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).