From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (dggsgout12.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C1CA61FFE for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 13:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762262778; cv=none; b=lnmYQgJLh1AsgYKJDOjbyvAitEgDYs600dckVbhG38jew6ssngfSTcShwtb1GfP+DsvExpL5CXVEp/muRwXYybL4P3MNndQCfNXLW4YNqgLD3xRfoAKit0GqKefSNhHok/QNIIRv0LWFmaMBRtdI/jxqwrNBfbZElIQ3B9vRB9g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762262778; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VW/r5ztc9/lTYth/a2Ag2ZmAt0TYfYdxPUylMss2G4g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=c+PgM6qJgsuowMA5i0j3/KQOGmH3CLfeqCfJUpdMqMXcxhdmIaryM/LGw+PW595M7LlZ1EIDEg3fslMX4sXLstv3Z5qcaewvuuPWc2xaxIUMJ8vaWhzuqGaiXA/7kMDwAuHF5jK5rsD1ac3deIXY2zcUdY4ptrjzd75yG0D2Sl8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout12.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4d18NX71WZzKHMp3 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 21:26:04 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.75]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA311A01A4 for ; Tue, 4 Nov 2025 21:26:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.50.87.129]) by APP2 (Coremail) with SMTP id Syh0CgCn_UXv_glpN8K+Cg--.58269S4; Tue, 04 Nov 2025 21:26:10 +0800 (CST) From: Yang Erkun To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz Cc: yi.zhang@huawei.com, libaokun1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, yangerkun@huaweicloud.com Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] ext4: remove useless code in ext4_map_create_blocks Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2025 21:17:47 +0800 Message-Id: <20251104131750.1581541-1-yangerkun@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID:Syh0CgCn_UXv_glpN8K+Cg--.58269S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7Cry8CFWxKF13ZryUJrW5Jrb_yoW8XFyDp3 sxCF48Gr1DWw1j9ayIkF1UXr13K3W5GrWUCrWxAw1rWayfCr9ayF10yF1SyFZYgrWfX3WY qF4Yk348uw4xJrJanT9S1TB71UUUUU7qnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUU9Eb4IE77IF4wAFF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4 vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Ar0_tr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7Cj xVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVCY1x 0267AKxVW0oVCq3wAS0I0E0xvYzxvE52x082IY62kv0487Mc02F40EFcxC0VAKzVAqx4xG 6I80ewAv7VC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUAVWUtwAv7VC2z280aVAFwI0_Gr1j6F4UJwAm72CE4I kC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lF7Iv64x0x7Aq67IIx4CEVc8vx2IErcIF xwCY1x0262kKe7AKxVWUAVWUtwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCF04k20xvEw4C26cxK6c8Ij2 8IcwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480 Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_Jw0_GFylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7 IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1lIxAIcVCF04k2 6cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxV AFwI0_Jr0_GrUvcSsGvfC2KfnxnUUI43ZEXa7IU1xnY5UUUUU== Sender: yangerkun@huaweicloud.com X-CM-SenderInfo: 51dqwvhunx0q5kxd4v5lfo033gof0z/ IO path with EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO means dio within i_size or dioread_nolock buffer writeback, they all means we need a unwritten extent(or this extent has already been initialized), and the split won't zero the range we really write. So this check seems useless. Besides, even if we repeatedly execute ext4_es_insert_extent, there won't actually be any issues. Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi Signed-off-by: Yang Erkun --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index e99306a8f47c..e8bac93ca668 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -583,7 +583,6 @@ static int ext4_map_query_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, struct ext4_map_blocks *map, int flags) { - struct extent_status es; unsigned int status; int err, retval = 0; @@ -644,16 +643,6 @@ static int ext4_map_create_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, return err; } - /* - * If the extent has been zeroed out, we don't need to update - * extent status tree. - */ - if (flags & EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_PRE_IO && - ext4_es_lookup_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, NULL, &es)) { - if (ext4_es_is_written(&es)) - return retval; - } - status = map->m_flags & EXT4_MAP_UNWRITTEN ? EXTENT_STATUS_UNWRITTEN : EXTENT_STATUS_WRITTEN; ext4_es_insert_extent(inode, map->m_lblk, map->m_len, map->m_pblk, -- 2.39.2