From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel@pankajraghav.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
chengzhihao1@huawei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun@huaweicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 21:23:27 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112052327.GL196358@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251112040220.GO2988753@mit.edu>
On Tue, Nov 11, 2025 at 11:02:20PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:19:06AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> > I am using a slightly older version of xfstests, and when running the
> > 64k tests I also encountered similar failures. The cover letter stated
> > "no Oops" for the 64k tests rather than "no new failures," meaning that
> > some cases did fail, but no severe issues such as BUG_ON or softlock
> > were observed.
>
> Sorry, I misread your cover letter. It's good you are seeing similar
> failures.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 10:49:19AM +0800, Baokun Li wrote:
> > I checked the code of the swapon syscall in mm/swapfile.c, and currently
> > the swapfile does not support LBS. Therefore, some failing test cases can
> > be filtered out based on this.
>
> Ah, OK. What's happening is with XFS the swap tests are being skipped
> automatically if the swapon fails. From _require_scratch_swapfils:
>
> *)
> if ! swapon "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> _scratch_unmount
> _notrun "swapfiles are not supported"
> fi
> ;;
>
>
> But ext4 has different logic:
>
> # ext* has supported all variants of swap files since their
> # introduction, so swapon should not fail.
>
> << famous last words >>
>
> case "$FSTYP" in
> ext2|ext3|ext4)
> if ! swapon "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" >/dev/null 2>&1; then
> if _check_s_dax "$SCRATCH_MNT/swap" 1 >/dev/null; then
> _scratch_unmount
> _notrun "swapfiles are not supported"
> else
> _scratch_unmount
> _fail "swapon failed for $FSTYP"
> fi
> fi
> ;;
>
>
> I guess we could add logic to _require_scratch_swapfile in common/rc
> to also _notrun if swapon fails and block size is greater that page
> size. Or I might just add an exclusion in my test appliance runner
> for now for all tests in group swap.
https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/176169820051.1433624.4158113392739761085.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs/T/#u
Hm?
--D
>
> - Ted
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 14:42 [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_truncate_page() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] ext4: remove PAGE_SIZE checks for rec_len conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] ext4: make ext4_punch_hole() support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10 9:35 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] ext4: enable DIOREAD_NOLOCK by default for BS > PS as well libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] ext4: introduce s_min_folio_order for future BS > PS support libaokun
2025-11-10 12:09 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_calculate_overhead() libaokun
2025-11-10 9:36 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_readdir() libaokun
2025-11-10 12:26 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 13:53 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_B macro for logical block to bytes conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_PG and EXT4_PG_TO_LBLK for block/page conversion libaokun
2025-11-10 9:37 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_init_cache() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] ext4: prepare buddy cache inode for BS > PS with large folios libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] ext4: rename 'page' references to 'folio' in multi-block allocator libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mpage_readpages() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_block_write_begin() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_map_and_submit_buffers() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] ext4: support large block size in __ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10 9:48 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 11:53 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] ext4: support verifying data from large folios with fs-verity libaokun
2025-11-10 9:54 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:08 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] ext4: add checks for large folio incompatibilities when BS > PS libaokun
2025-11-10 9:59 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-10 10:00 ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:51 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 15:23 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 3:31 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:16 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 3:43 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 4:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] " Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10 6:18 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:34 ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 17:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12 2:19 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 4:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12 5:23 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2025-11-12 6:27 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 15:29 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-13 9:14 ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 2:49 ` Baokun Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251112052327.GL196358@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
--cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
--cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).