From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix ext4_tune_sb_params padding
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:19:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251204101914.1037148-1-arnd@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
The padding at the end of struct ext4_tune_sb_params is architecture
specific and in particular is different between x86-32 and x86-64,
since the __u64 member only enforces struct alignment on the latter.
This shows up as a new warning when test-building the headers with
-Wpadded:
include/linux/ext4.h:144:1: error: padding struct size to alignment boundary with 4 bytes [-Werror=padded]
All members inside the structure are naturally aligned, so the only
difference here is the amount of padding at the end. Make the padding
explicit, to have a consistent sizeof(struct ext4_tune_sb_params) of
232 on all architectures and avoid adding compat ioctl handling for
EXT4_IOC_GET_TUNE_SB_PARAM/EXT4_IOC_SET_TUNE_SB_PARAM.
This is an ABI break on x86-32 but hopefully this can go into 6.18.y early
enough as a fixup so no actual users will be affected. Alternatively, the
kernel could handle the ioctl commands for both sizes (232 and 228 bytes)
on all architectures.
Fixes: 04a91570ac67 ("ext4: implemet new ioctls to set and get superblock parameters")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
include/uapi/linux/ext4.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/ext4.h b/include/uapi/linux/ext4.h
index 411dcc1e4a35..9c683991c32f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/ext4.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/ext4.h
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct ext4_tune_sb_params {
__u32 clear_feature_incompat_mask;
__u32 clear_feature_ro_compat_mask;
__u8 mount_opts[64];
- __u8 pad[64];
+ __u8 pad[68];
};
#define EXT4_TUNE_FL_ERRORS_BEHAVIOR 0x00000001
--
2.39.5
next reply other threads:[~2025-12-04 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-04 10:19 Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2025-12-04 10:31 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix ext4_tune_sb_params padding Jan Kara
2025-12-05 10:17 ` Andreas Dilger
2025-12-05 11:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-12-19 8:43 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-12-04 12:35 ` David Laight
2025-12-04 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-12-04 16:06 ` David Laight
2026-01-15 15:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251204101914.1037148-1-arnd@kernel.org \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox