From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: zlang@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs/018: remove inline xattr recovery tests
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 22:22:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260206062222.GN7686@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYWDTrxRhDAE2efB@infradead.org>
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 09:59:42PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:56:24AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > "In Linux 7.0 we've changed the extended attribute update code to try to
> > take a shortcut for performance reasons. Before walking through the
> > attr intent state machine (slow), the update will check to see if the
> > attr structure is in short format and will stay in that format after the
> > change. If so, then the incore inode can be updated and logged, and the
> > update is complete (fast) in a single transaction.
> >
> > "(Obviously, for complex attr structures or large changes we still walk
> > through the intent machinery.)
> >
> > "However, xfs/018 tests the behavior of the "larp" error injector, which
> > only triggers from inside the attr intent state machine. Therefore, the
> > short format tests don't actually trip the injector. It makes no sense
> > to add a new larp injection callsite for the shortcut because either the
> > single transaction gets written to disk or it doesn't."
>
> Make sense, but from looking at the test I'm still a bit confused
> why it fails (vs just not testing something too useful)
The golden output no longer matches because the attr update doesn't
return EIO and shut down the filesystem due to the larp injection.
--D
> >
> > > Only vaguely related, but should we ensure to always clear error
> > > tags after the test runs to ensure they don't leak into other tests?
> >
> > They go away with _scratch_remount because error tags only live as long
> > as the mount.
>
> True. While still leaves me puzzled why generic/753 now hits attr log
> recovery for me sometimes.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-02 19:11 [PATCHSET] fstests: more random fixes for v2026.01.27 Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs/018: remove inline xattr recovery tests Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-03 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 16:56 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-05 17:19 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-02-06 5:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-06 6:22 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-02-06 6:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-06 6:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-06 21:54 ` [PATCH v1.1 " Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs/620: force xattr leaf format for this test Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-03 5:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 17:15 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-02-02 19:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] generic/749: don't write a ton of _mread output to seqres.full Darrick J. Wong
2026-02-03 5:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-02-05 17:17 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260206062222.GN7686@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zlang@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox