From: "Theodore Tso" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Deepanshu Kartikey <kartikey406@gmail.com>,
syzkaller@googlegroups.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+fb32afec111a7d61b939@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: SYZKALLER BUG: messing with a mounted file system via loop ioctls (was: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add bounds check in ext4_xattr_ibody_get() to) prevent out-of-bounds access
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2026 08:48:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260329134832.GA8782@Mac> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACT4Y+ZzbnD_puTRMx4MpcACpp5m3aMhQYvH+1LAyTKOz6otEw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Mar 29, 2026 at 11:47:44AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Thanks for the report.
>
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/text?tag=ReproSyz&x=17a43b3a580000
>
> Do you mean LOOP_SET_STATUS64 ioctl? It's the only ioctl in the repro:
>
> ioctl$LOOP_SET_STATUS64(r0, 0x4c04, ...)
The loop LOOP_SET_STATUS ioctl is also problematic.
> Does it mean it should also be prohibited under
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED to avoid kernel memory corruption?
> Or at least some changes should be prohibited? E.g. I guess changing
> lo_offset is equivalent to writing to the mounted device.
Yes, that's correct. LOOP_SET_STATUS[64] can set lo_offset and
lo_sizelimit which effectively mutates the loop device while it is
mounted.
The fix is something like:
diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index 0000913f7efc..c1d17e2bbd0c 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -1238,6 +1238,16 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct loop_info64 *info)
err = -ENXIO;
goto out_unlock;
}
+#ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED)
+ /*
+ * bdev_writes_blocked is a static function defiend in
+ * block/bdev.c, so this won't work as-is.
+ */
+ if (bdev_writes_blocked(lo->lo_device)) {
+ err = -EBUSY;
+ goto out_unlock;
+ }
+#endif
if (lo->lo_offset != info->lo_offset ||
lo->lo_sizelimit != info->lo_sizelimit) {
Turning this into a real patch that exports bdev_writes_blocked() is
left as an exercise to the reader.
- Ted
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-29 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-24 23:14 [PATCH] ext4: add bounds check in ext4_xattr_ibody_get() to prevent out-of-bounds access Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-03-10 1:47 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-03-26 5:47 ` Theodore Tso
2026-03-27 14:32 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-03-27 16:31 ` SYZKALLER BUG: messing with a mounted file system via loop ioctls (was: Re: [PATCH] ext4: add bounds check in ext4_xattr_ibody_get() to) " Theodore Tso
2026-03-28 15:02 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-03-29 9:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2026-03-29 13:48 ` Theodore Tso [this message]
2026-03-29 14:39 ` Deepanshu Kartikey
2026-03-29 17:06 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260329134832.GA8782@Mac \
--to=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=kartikey406@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot+fb32afec111a7d61b939@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox