From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] fix up issues from djwong/fuse4fs-fork
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 15:56:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505225635.GT7765@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505220441.GB49070@macsyma.local>
On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 12:04:41AM +0200, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 08:58:21AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Hrm. A bisect would be the best (but least conference-friendly) option
> > to narrow things down.
>
> Well, a bisect was a bit painful because I had to cherry-pick patches
> so I could get a successfull build. But I did finally come up with
> the guilty commit, and it's.... surprising at least to me:
>
> commit b0bd58062bbf645942ab4f0aced3bb229f462dde
> Author: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> Date: Thu Aug 28 10:30:40 2025 -0700
>
> fuse2fs: cache symlink targets in the kernel
>
> Speed up symlinks by allowing the kernel to cache them.
>
> Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
>
> I don't know why it made a difference, but this attached patch appears
> fix the MacOS regression. Could this be a bug in MacFuse[1]? FWIW, I'm
> running MacFuse 5.2.0_1 from MacPorts.
>
> [1] https://macfuse.github.io
>
> I could condition the patch so that we only avoid setting
> FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS on MacOS? WDYT?
I vomit a little in my mouth, because...
$ cd macfuse/Library-3
$ git grep FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS
<snip>
include/fuse_common.h:472:#define FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS (1UL << 23)
Ok, so fuse2fs passes want-flag 1<<23 into the kernel to turn on what it
*thinks* are cached symlinks.
[Editor's note: this email previously contained the following text]
Unfortunately, we both now hit a brick wall, because the macfuse
page says:
"This repository contains the source code of libfuse.dylib and
macFUSE.framework. The other components, e.g. the macFUSE kernel
extension, are closed-source."
Hence we have no way to find out what the kext thinks 1<<23 means.
There's talk of some sort of "fskit" replacement for the signed
kext, but I don't know where that is.
Actually, it's *MUCH* worse than that. Look at what
Library-3/include/fuse_kernel.h contains:
#ifdef __APPLE__
/*
* TODO(bf)
*
* Resolve conflict with vanilla API. As long as we don't support anything
* beyond 7.19 on the kernel-side this should not be an issue. We need to clean
* this up when moving to 7.20 or later.
*/
#define FUSE_DARWIN_ACCESS_EXT (1 << 23)
#define FUSE_DARWIN_THREAD_SAFE (1 << 24)
#define FUSE_DARWIN_RENAME_EXT ((1 << 25) | (1 << 26))
#define FUSE_DARWIN_FALLOCATE (1 << 27)
#define FUSE_DARWIN_CASE_INSENSITIVE (1 << 29)
#define FUSE_DARWIN_SETVOLNAME (1 << 30)
#endif
Then look up about 30 lines:
#define FUSE_CACHE_SYMLINKS (1 << 23)
#define FUSE_NO_OPENDIR_SUPPORT (1 << 24)
#define FUSE_EXPLICIT_INVAL_DATA (1 << 25)
#define FUSE_MAP_ALIGNMENT (1 << 26)
#define FUSE_SUBMOUNTS (1 << 27)
#define FUSE_HANDLE_KILLPRIV_V2 (1 << 28)
#define FUSE_SETXATTR_EXT (1 << 29)
#define FUSE_INIT_EXT (1 << 30)
FUSE kABI 7.20 added FUSE_AUTO_INVAL_DATA, which is bit 12. It looks to
me as though they decided to add their own MacOS-specific feature flags
at the end of the u32 want field. Then Linux FUSE added 11 more feature
flags, at which point they unthinkingly ported over FUSE_CACHE_SYMLINKS,
which collides with FUSE_DARWIN_ACCESS_EXT. Apparently nobody on the
macfuse end noticed, so on your machine you're getting whatever
"ACCESS_EXT" does.
$searchengine has zero hits for FUSE_DARWIN_ACCESS_EXT so who knows what
that actually does. But this sure is a messed up situation.
Does this work?
/* MacFUSE overlays feature bits with LinuxFUSE, this is fcked up */
#if defined(FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS) && !defined(FUSE_CACHE_SYMLINKS)
fuse_set_feature_flag(conn, FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS);
#endif
--D
> - Ted
> From fb3d2fc975d17d97ed76b2ed76022462a3b329f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 23:34:53 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "fuse2fs: cache symlink targets in the kernel"
>
> This reverts commit b0bd58062bbf645942ab4f0aced3bb229f462dde.
>
> This commit is apparently causing fuse2fs on MacOS to fail without "-o
> default_permissions". It's not clear why, but it was determined using
> a git bisect, and reverting the commit addresses the regression.
>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> ---
> misc/fuse2fs.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/misc/fuse2fs.c b/misc/fuse2fs.c
> index c46cfc23..0f9cefa6 100644
> --- a/misc/fuse2fs.c
> +++ b/misc/fuse2fs.c
> @@ -1593,9 +1593,6 @@ static void *op_init(struct fuse_conn_info *conn,
> if (ff->acl)
> fuse_set_feature_flag(conn, FUSE_CAP_POSIX_ACL);
> #endif
> -#ifdef FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS
> - fuse_set_feature_flag(conn, FUSE_CAP_CACHE_SYMLINKS);
> -#endif
> #ifdef FUSE_CAP_NO_EXPORT_SUPPORT
> fuse_set_feature_flag(conn, FUSE_CAP_NO_EXPORT_SUPPORT);
> #endif
> --
> 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-04 23:32 [PATCH 0/7] fix up issues from djwong/fuse4fs-fork Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-04 23:32 ` [PATCH 1/7] libsupport: drop xbitops.h and define fls() if necessary Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:11 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-04 23:32 ` [PATCH 2/7] configure.ac: fix disable fuse2fs/fuse4fs by default path Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:13 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-04 23:32 ` [PATCH 3/7] libsupport: don't use bzero in cache.c Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:15 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-04 23:32 ` [PATCH 4/7] fuse[24]fs: suppress clang warnings which were breaking the github CI Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-04 23:32 ` [PATCH 5/7] libsupport: remove the LIST_HEAD macro from list.h Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-04 23:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] libsupport: fix gcc -Wall warnings Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:20 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-04 23:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] fuse2fs: fix uninitialized variable warnings Theodore Ts'o
2026-05-05 0:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-05 0:08 ` [PATCH 0/7] fix up issues from djwong/fuse4fs-fork Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-05 7:21 ` Theodore Tso
2026-05-05 15:58 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-05 22:04 ` Theodore Tso
2026-05-05 22:56 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505225635.GT7765@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox