From: Li Chen <me@linux.beauty>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix fast commit wait/wake bit mapping on 64-bit
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 16:58:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513085818.552432-1-me@linux.beauty> (raw)
On 64-bit, ext4 dynamic inode states live in the upper half of i_flags,
and ext4_test_inode_state() applies the corresponding +32 offset.
The fast-commit wait and wake paths open-coded the wait key with the raw
EXT4_STATE_* value. Add small helpers for the state wait word and bit,
and use them for the FC_COMMITTING and FC_FLUSHING_DATA waits so the wait
key follows the same mapping as the state helpers.
Fixes: 857d32f26181 ("ext4: rework fast commit commit path")
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Li Chen <chenl311@chinatelecom.cn>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 20 +++++++++++++++++
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++---------------------------
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 94283a991e5c..6569d1d575a0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -2000,6 +2000,8 @@ EXT4_INODE_BIT_FNS(flag, flags, 0)
static inline int ext4_test_inode_state(struct inode *inode, int bit);
static inline void ext4_set_inode_state(struct inode *inode, int bit);
static inline void ext4_clear_inode_state(struct inode *inode, int bit);
+static inline unsigned long *ext4_inode_state_wait_word(struct inode *inode);
+static inline int ext4_inode_state_wait_bit(int bit);
#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
EXT4_INODE_BIT_FNS(state, state_flags, 0)
@@ -2015,6 +2017,24 @@ static inline void ext4_clear_state_flags(struct ext4_inode_info *ei)
/* We depend on the fact that callers will set i_flags */
}
#endif
+
+static inline unsigned long *ext4_inode_state_wait_word(struct inode *inode)
+{
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
+ return &EXT4_I(inode)->i_state_flags;
+#else
+ return &EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags;
+#endif
+}
+
+static inline int ext4_inode_state_wait_bit(int bit)
+{
+#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
+ return bit;
+#else
+ return bit + 32;
+#endif
+}
#else
/* Assume that user mode programs are passing in an ext4fs superblock, not
* a kernel struct super_block. This will allow us to call the feature-test
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
index b3c22636251d..1775bce9649a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fast_commit.c
@@ -239,6 +239,8 @@ void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
struct ext4_fc_dentry_update *fc_dentry;
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
+ unsigned long *wait_word = ext4_inode_state_wait_word(inode);
+ int wait_bit = ext4_inode_state_wait_bit(EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
int alloc_ctx;
if (ext4_fc_disabled(inode->i_sb))
@@ -268,17 +270,9 @@ void ext4_fc_del(struct inode *inode)
WARN_ON(ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING)
&& !ext4_test_mount_flag(inode->i_sb, EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE));
while (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA)) {
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
- DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_state_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
- wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_state_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
-#else
- DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
- wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
-#endif
+ DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, wait_word, wait_bit);
+
+ wq = bit_waitqueue(wait_word, wait_bit);
prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA)) {
ext4_fc_unlock(inode->i_sb, alloc_ctx);
@@ -542,6 +536,8 @@ void ext4_fc_track_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
{
struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
+ unsigned long *wait_word = ext4_inode_state_wait_word(inode);
+ int wait_bit = ext4_inode_state_wait_bit(EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
int ret;
if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode))
@@ -564,17 +560,9 @@ void ext4_fc_track_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
lockdep_assert_not_held(&ei->i_data_sem);
while (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING)) {
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
- DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_state_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
- wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_state_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#else
- DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &ei->i_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
- wq = bit_waitqueue(&ei->i_flags,
- EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#endif
+ DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, wait_word, wait_bit);
+
+ wq = bit_waitqueue(wait_word, wait_bit);
prepare_to_wait(wq, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING))
schedule();
@@ -1034,6 +1022,8 @@ static int ext4_fc_perform_commit(journal_t *journal)
int ret = 0;
u32 crc = 0;
int alloc_ctx;
+ int flushing_wait_bit =
+ ext4_inode_state_wait_bit(EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
/*
* Step 1: Mark all inodes on s_fc_q[MAIN] with
@@ -1059,11 +1049,8 @@ static int ext4_fc_perform_commit(journal_t *journal)
list_for_each_entry(iter, &sbi->s_fc_q[FC_Q_MAIN], i_fc_list) {
ext4_clear_inode_state(&iter->vfs_inode,
EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
- wake_up_bit(&iter->i_state_flags, EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
-#else
- wake_up_bit(&iter->i_flags, EXT4_STATE_FC_FLUSHING_DATA);
-#endif
+ wake_up_bit(ext4_inode_state_wait_word(&iter->vfs_inode),
+ flushing_wait_bit);
}
/*
@@ -1279,6 +1266,8 @@ static void ext4_fc_cleanup(journal_t *journal, int full, tid_t tid)
struct ext4_inode_info *ei;
struct ext4_fc_dentry_update *fc_dentry;
int alloc_ctx;
+ int committing_wait_bit =
+ ext4_inode_state_wait_bit(EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
if (full && sbi->s_fc_bh)
sbi->s_fc_bh = NULL;
@@ -1315,11 +1304,8 @@ static void ext4_fc_cleanup(journal_t *journal, int full, tid_t tid)
* barrier in prepare_to_wait() in ext4_fc_track_inode().
*/
smp_mb();
-#if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64)
- wake_up_bit(&ei->i_state_flags, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#else
- wake_up_bit(&ei->i_flags, EXT4_STATE_FC_COMMITTING);
-#endif
+ wake_up_bit(ext4_inode_state_wait_word(&ei->vfs_inode),
+ committing_wait_bit);
}
while (!list_empty(&sbi->s_fc_dentry_q[FC_Q_MAIN])) {
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 8:58 Li Chen [this message]
2026-05-13 9:45 ` [PATCH] ext4: fix fast commit wait/wake bit mapping on 64-bit Jan Kara
2026-05-14 12:00 ` Zhang Yi
2026-05-29 9:57 ` Baokun Li
2026-06-04 14:45 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513085818.552432-1-me@linux.beauty \
--to=me@linux.beauty \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox