Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, zlang@redhat.com,
	hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/11] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 21:27:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260529042743.GB6070@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421c7cdd5aae27b99d04dddf08c5d9df79c2f790.1779939330.git.asj@kernel.org>

On Thu, May 28, 2026 at 12:05:32PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
> Introduce _loop_image_create_clone() and _loop_image_destroy() to mkfs an
> image file and clone it to another image file, and attach a loop device to
> them. And its destroy part.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <asj@kernel.org>
> ---
>  common/rc | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/common/rc b/common/rc
> index 79189e7e6e94..d7e3e0bdfb1e 100644
> --- a/common/rc
> +++ b/common/rc
> @@ -1520,6 +1520,69 @@ _scratch_resvblks()
>  	esac
>  }
>  
> +# Create a small loop image, run an optional tuning function ($2) on it,
> +# clone it, and attach both to loop devices, returned in ($1).
> +# Args:
> +#   $1: Nameref to return the array of allocated loop devices [base, clone].
> +#   $2: Optional callback function to tune the base filesystem before cloning.
> +_loop_image_create_clone()
> +{
> +	local -n _ret=$1

That switch   ^^ is very clever.  I always wondered how one did indirect
variables in bash.

> +	local pre_clone_tune_func="$2"
> +	local img_file=$TEST_DIR/${seq}.img
> +	local img_file_clone=$TEST_DIR/${seq}_clone.img
> +	local size=$(_small_fs_size_mb 128) # Smallest possible
> +	local loop_devs
> +
> +	# Since we copy the block device image, we keep its size small.
> +	_require_fs_space $TEST_DIR $((size * 1024))
> +
> +	_create_file_sized $((size * 1024 * 1024)) $img_file ||
> +				_fail "Failed: Create $img_file $size"
> +
> +	loop_devs=$(_create_loop_device $img_file)
> +	_ret=($loop_devs)

Should this check that a loopdev actually got created?

> +	case $FSTYP in
> +	xfs)
> +		_mkfs_dev "-s size=4096" ${loop_devs[0]}
> +		;;
> +	btrfs)
> +		_mkfs_dev ${loop_devs[0]}
> +		;;
> +	*)
> +		_mkfs_dev ${loop_devs[0]}
> +		;;
> +	esac
> +
> +	# Only execute if the function argument is not empty
> +	if [ -n "$pre_clone_tune_func" ]; then
> +		$pre_clone_tune_func ${loop_devs[0]}
> +	fi
> +
> +	sync ${loop_devs[0]}
> +	cp $img_file $img_file_clone
> +
> +	loop_devs="$loop_devs $(_create_loop_device $img_file_clone)"

	local lodev="$(_create_loop_device ...)"

	test -z "$lodev" && _fail "second loopdev not created"
	_ret+=("$lodev")

?

> +
> +	_ret=($loop_devs)
> +}
> +
> +# Teardown loop devices and delete their underlying backing image files.
> +# Accepts a list of loop device paths (e.g., /dev/loop0 /dev/loop1).
> +_loop_image_destroy()
> +{
> +	for d in "$@"; do
> +		# Retrieve the path of the backing file
> +		local f=$(losetup --noheadings --output BACK-FILE $d)
> +
> +		# Detach the loop device from the backing file
> +		_destroy_loop_device "$d"
> +
> +		# Clean up the backing disk image file
> +		[ -n "$f" ] && rm -f "$f"
> +	done
> +}
>  
>  # Repair scratch filesystem.  Returns 0 if the FS is good to go (either no
>  # errors found or errors were fixed) and nonzero otherwise; also spits out
> -- 
> 2.43.0
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28  4:05 [PATCH v6 0/11] fstests: add test coverage for cloned filesystem ids Anand Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 01/11] fstests: add _loop_image_create_clone() helper Anand Jain
2026-05-29  4:27   ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-06-08 14:39     ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-06-09 14:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 02/11] fstests: add _clone_mount_option() helper Anand Jain
2026-05-29  4:28   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-08 14:41     ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 03/11] fstests: add FSNOTIFYWAIT_PROG Anand Jain
2026-05-29  4:29   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 04/11] fstests: add _require_unique_f_fsid() helper Anand Jain
2026-05-29  4:30   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-08 14:43     ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 05/11] fstests: verify fanotify isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-05-29  4:36   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-08 14:45     ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 06/11] fstests: verify f_fsid for " Anand Jain
2026-05-29  4:39   ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-08 14:59     ` Anand Suveer Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 07/11] fstests: verify libblkid resolution of duplicate UUIDs Anand Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 08/11] fstests: verify IMA isolation on cloned filesystems Anand Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 09/11] fstests: verify exportfs file handles " Anand Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 10/11] fstests: add _change_metadata_uuid helper Anand Jain
2026-05-28  4:05 ` [PATCH v6 11/11] fstests: test UUID consistency for clones with metadata_uuid Anand Jain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260529042743.GB6070@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=asj@kernel.org \
    --cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zlang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox