Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz,
	yi.zhang@huawei.com, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: reject mount if clusters/inodes per group are not 8-aligned
Date: Mon,  8 Jun 2026 19:11:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260608111150.827117-2-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608111150.827117-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

The block and inode bitmap checksums are computed over a whole number of
bytes: ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) >> 3 and
ext4_block_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8 as the
length passed to ext4_chksum().

If s_inodes_per_group or s_clusters_per_group is not a multiple of 8, the
trailing fractional bits are excluded from the checksum.  Those bits are
then unprotected, and any incremental csum update path that assumes a
byte-aligned bitmap can compute a checksum inconsistent with the full
recalculation, corrupting the on-disk bitmap checksum.

Reject such filesystems at mount time by adding the missing " & 7"
alignment checks alongside the existing range validation.

Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/h3n7jlfhyna64dn5o76qxcspnhxdddcs6crpxftmy7gnl7b3sx@jenszfpcsnit
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508121539.4174601-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com?part=10
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 6a77db4d3124..3ddcb4a8d4db 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4472,8 +4472,9 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
 		sbi->s_cluster_bits = 0;
 	}
 	sbi->s_clusters_per_group = le32_to_cpu(es->s_clusters_per_group);
-	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
-		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "#clusters per group too big: %lu",
+	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
+	    sbi->s_clusters_per_group & 7) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid #clusters per group: %lu",
 			 sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -5304,8 +5305,9 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
-	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
-		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu\n",
+	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
+	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
 			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.43.7


  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-08 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-08 11:11 [PATCH v2 0/3] ext4: tighten mount-time superblock geometry validation Baokun Li
2026-06-08 11:11 ` Baokun Li [this message]
2026-06-08 12:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: reject mount if clusters/inodes per group are not 8-aligned Zhang Yi
2026-06-08 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit Baokun Li
2026-06-08 18:24   ` Andreas Dilger
2026-06-09  2:48   ` Zhang Yi
2026-06-08 11:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per block Baokun Li
2026-06-08 18:27   ` Andreas Dilger
2026-06-09  1:46     ` Baokun Li
2026-06-09  3:33   ` Zhang Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260608111150.827117-2-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox