[PATCH v2 0/3] ext4: tighten mount-time superblock geometry validation

[PATCH v2 0/3] ext4: tighten mount-time superblock geometry validation

[Baokun Li]

Changes since v1:
 * Patch 1: Removed a spurious newline in the error message format string.
 * Added Patches 2 and 3 to fix additional issues reported by Sashiko
   (independent of Patch 1).

v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com

This series adds missing mount-time sanity checks for superblock
geometry parameters, preventing crafted filesystem images from causing
bitmap checksum corruption, integer overflow, or out-of-bounds inode
table access.

Patch 1 rejects filesystems where s_clusters_per_group or
s_inodes_per_group is not 8-aligned, since the bitmap checksum
functions operate on whole bytes and would leave trailing bits
unprotected.

Patch 2 reduces EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE from 30 to 28 to match
the documented 256MB limit in mke2fs, preventing a 32-bit overflow
in the blocks-per-group consistency check on bigalloc filesystems.

Patch 3 rejects filesystems where s_inodes_per_group is not a
multiple of s_inodes_per_block, preventing truncation in the
s_itb_per_group calculation that could lead __ext4_get_inode_loc()
to read beyond the inode table.

Baokun Li (3):
  ext4: reject mount if clusters/inodes per group are not 8-aligned
  ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit
  ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per
    block

 fs/ext4/ext4.h  |  2 +-
 fs/ext4/super.c | 11 +++++++----
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.7

[PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: reject mount if clusters/inodes per group are not 8-aligned

[Baokun Li]

The block and inode bitmap checksums are computed over a whole number of
bytes: ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) >> 3 and
ext4_block_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8 as the
length passed to ext4_chksum().

If s_inodes_per_group or s_clusters_per_group is not a multiple of 8, the
trailing fractional bits are excluded from the checksum.  Those bits are
then unprotected, and any incremental csum update path that assumes a
byte-aligned bitmap can compute a checksum inconsistent with the full
recalculation, corrupting the on-disk bitmap checksum.

Reject such filesystems at mount time by adding the missing " & 7"
alignment checks alongside the existing range validation.

Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/h3n7jlfhyna64dn5o76qxcspnhxdddcs6crpxftmy7gnl7b3sx@jenszfpcsnit
Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508121539.4174601-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com?part=10
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 6a77db4d3124..3ddcb4a8d4db 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4472,8 +4472,9 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
 		sbi->s_cluster_bits = 0;
 	}
 	sbi->s_clusters_per_group = le32_to_cpu(es->s_clusters_per_group);
-	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
-		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "#clusters per group too big: %lu",
+	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
+	    sbi->s_clusters_per_group & 7) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid #clusters per group: %lu",
 			 sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
@@ -5304,8 +5305,9 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
-	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
-		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu\n",
+	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
+	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
+		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
 			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
-- 
2.43.7

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: reject mount if clusters/inodes per group are not 8-aligned

[Zhang Yi]

On 6/8/2026 7:11 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> The block and inode bitmap checksums are computed over a whole number of
> bytes: ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) >> 3 and
> ext4_block_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8 as the
> length passed to ext4_chksum().
> 
> If s_inodes_per_group or s_clusters_per_group is not a multiple of 8, the
> trailing fractional bits are excluded from the checksum.  Those bits are
> then unprotected, and any incremental csum update path that assumes a
> byte-aligned bitmap can compute a checksum inconsistent with the full
> recalculation, corrupting the on-disk bitmap checksum.
> 
> Reject such filesystems at mount time by adding the missing " & 7"
> alignment checks alongside the existing range validation.
> 
> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/h3n7jlfhyna64dn5o76qxcspnhxdddcs6crpxftmy7gnl7b3sx@jenszfpcsnit
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508121539.4174601-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com?part=10
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks good to me. Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

> ---
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 6a77db4d3124..3ddcb4a8d4db 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4472,8 +4472,9 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
>  		sbi->s_cluster_bits = 0;
>  	}
>  	sbi->s_clusters_per_group = le32_to_cpu(es->s_clusters_per_group);
> -	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
> -		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "#clusters per group too big: %lu",
> +	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> +	    sbi->s_clusters_per_group & 7) {
> +		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid #clusters per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -5304,8 +5305,9 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
> -	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
> -		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu\n",
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
> +		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ext4: reject mount if clusters/inodes per group are not 8-aligned

[Jan Kara]

On Mon 08-06-26 19:11:48, Baokun Li wrote:
> The block and inode bitmap checksums are computed over a whole number of
> bytes: ext4_inode_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb) >> 3 and
> ext4_block_bitmap_csum_*() use EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb) / 8 as the
> length passed to ext4_chksum().
> 
> If s_inodes_per_group or s_clusters_per_group is not a multiple of 8, the
> trailing fractional bits are excluded from the checksum.  Those bits are
> then unprotected, and any incremental csum update path that assumes a
> byte-aligned bitmap can compute a checksum inconsistent with the full
> recalculation, corrupting the on-disk bitmap checksum.
> 
> Reject such filesystems at mount time by adding the missing " & 7"
> alignment checks alongside the existing range validation.
> 
> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/h3n7jlfhyna64dn5o76qxcspnhxdddcs6crpxftmy7gnl7b3sx@jenszfpcsnit
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508121539.4174601-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com?part=10
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 6a77db4d3124..3ddcb4a8d4db 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -4472,8 +4472,9 @@ static int ext4_handle_clustersize(struct super_block *sb)
>  		sbi->s_cluster_bits = 0;
>  	}
>  	sbi->s_clusters_per_group = le32_to_cpu(es->s_clusters_per_group);
> -	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
> -		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "#clusters per group too big: %lu",
> +	if (sbi->s_clusters_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> +	    sbi->s_clusters_per_group & 7) {
> +		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid #clusters per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_clusters_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> @@ -5304,8 +5305,9 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
> -	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8) {
> -		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu\n",
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
> +		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit

[Baokun Li]

The mke2fs man page documents:

  Valid cluster-size values are from 2048 to 256M bytes per cluster.

but EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE was set to 30 (1GB), allowing crafted
filesystem images to specify cluster sizes up to 1GB.

On 32-bit systems with bigalloc enabled, the consistency check in
ext4_handle_clustersize():

  s_blocks_per_group == s_clusters_per_group * (clustersize / blocksize)

can overflow when the cluster ratio is large enough. Since
s_blocks_per_group is not range-checked in the bigalloc path, the
wrapped product can pass the consistency check, leading to inconsistent
group geometry and potential out-of-bounds block allocation.

Reduce EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE to 28 to match the documented 256MB
limit. With this cap, the maximum product is:

  (blocksize * 8) * (256M / blocksize) = 2^31

which fits safely in a 32-bit unsigned long for all block sizes.

Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 94283a991e5c..11e41a864db8 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct ext4_io_submit {
 #define	EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE		65536
 #define EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE		10
 #define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE		16
-#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE	30
+#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE	28
 #ifdef __KERNEL__
 # define EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(s)		((s)->s_blocksize)
 #else
-- 
2.43.7

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit

[Andreas Dilger]

On Jun 8, 2026, at 05:11, Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
> The mke2fs man page documents:
> 
>  Valid cluster-size values are from 2048 to 256M bytes per cluster.
> 
> but EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE was set to 30 (1GB), allowing crafted
> filesystem images to specify cluster sizes up to 1GB.
> 
> On 32-bit systems with bigalloc enabled, the consistency check in
> ext4_handle_clustersize():
> 
>  s_blocks_per_group == s_clusters_per_group * (clustersize / blocksize)
> 
> can overflow when the cluster ratio is large enough. Since
> s_blocks_per_group is not range-checked in the bigalloc path, the
> wrapped product can pass the consistency check, leading to inconsistent
> group geometry and potential out-of-bounds block allocation.
> 
> Reduce EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE to 28 to match the documented 256MB
> limit. With this cap, the maximum product is:
> 
>  (blocksize * 8) * (256M / blocksize) = 2^31
> 
> which fits safely in a 32-bit unsigned long for all block sizes.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

It should be pretty safe.  I doubt anyone could be using > 1GiB clusters for real-world
usage at this point, given the nature of the bug and the amount of space used for metadata
(e.g. 1GiB per directory, etc).  At that granularity they can use LVM for space management.

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca <mailto:adilger@dilger.ca>>

> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 94283a991e5c..11e41a864db8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct ext4_io_submit {
>  #define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE 65536
>  #define EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE 10
>  #define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE 16
> -#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE 30
> +#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE 28
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  # define EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(s) ((s)->s_blocksize)
>  #else
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 


Cheers, Andreas

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit

[Zhang Yi]

Hi, Baokun!

On 6/8/2026 7:11 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> The mke2fs man page documents:
> 
>   Valid cluster-size values are from 2048 to 256M bytes per cluster.

Hmm, I checked the mke2fs(8)[1] and didn't find this sentence, instead,
it said:

  Valid cluster-size values range from 2 to 32768 times the filesystem
  block size and must be a power of 2.

However, the implementation of mkfs does not seem to respect this
constraint and instead directly uses static macros to limit the
user-specified cluster size.

  #define EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE         10      /* 1024 */
  #define EXT2_MIN_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE       EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE
  #define EXT2_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE       29      /* 512MB  */

This is confusing, or perhaps I missed something. If I understand
correctly, users can now format an image with a maximum cluster size of
512 MB (I tried it, and it worked). If the kernel's
EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE is limited to 28, this would cause such
existing images to become unmountable, even though I don't think images
with such a large cluster size actually exist in practice. Therefore,
I'm not sure this is safe.

[1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/mke2fs.8.html

> 
> but EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE was set to 30 (1GB), allowing crafted
> filesystem images to specify cluster sizes up to 1GB.
> 
> On 32-bit systems with bigalloc enabled, the consistency check in
> ext4_handle_clustersize():
> 
>   s_blocks_per_group == s_clusters_per_group * (clustersize / blocksize)
> 
> can overflow when the cluster ratio is large enough. Since
> s_blocks_per_group is not range-checked in the bigalloc path, the
> wrapped product can pass the consistency check, leading to inconsistent
> group geometry and potential out-of-bounds block allocation.
> 
> Reduce EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE to 28 to match the documented 256MB
> limit. With this cap, the maximum product is:
> 
>   (blocksize * 8) * (256M / blocksize) = 2^31
> 
> which fits safely in a 32-bit unsigned long for all block sizes.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 94283a991e5c..11e41a864db8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct ext4_io_submit {
>  #define	EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE		65536
>  #define EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE		10
>  #define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE		16
> -#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE	30
> +#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE	28
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  # define EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(s)		((s)->s_blocksize)
>  #else

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit

[Baokun Li]

On 2026/6/9 10:48, Zhang Yi wrote:
> Hi, Baokun!

Hi Yi,

Thank you for you review!

> On 6/8/2026 7:11 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
>> The mke2fs man page documents:
>>
>>   Valid cluster-size values are from 2048 to 256M bytes per cluster.
> Hmm, I checked the mke2fs(8)[1] and didn't find this sentence, instead,
> it said:
>
>   Valid cluster-size values range from 2 to 32768 times the filesystem
>   block size and must be a power of 2.

Oh, I was indeed looking at a slightly older man page. It was changed to
the current description in commit 87cbb381f2e2 ("e2fsprogs:
misc/mke2fs.8.in: Correct valid cluster-size values").

That commit assumes the number of blocks in a cluster cannot exceed the
maximum number of blocks that a single extent can hold
(EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN = 32768). I believe this is wrong — a single cluster
can be covered by multiple extents. So we should fix the bug in
ext_falloc_helper() rather than working around it by adding a
restriction to the documentation.

The root cause is in ext_falloc_helper():

    max_uninit_len = EXT_UNINIT_MAX_LEN & ~EXT2FS_CLUSTER_MASK(fs);
    max_init_len = EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN & ~EXT2FS_CLUSTER_MASK(fs);

When cluster_ratio >= EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN (32768), the `& ~CLUSTER_MASK`
operation zeroes out both values, causing ext2fs_new_range() to receive
len=0 and return EXT2_ET_INVALID_ARGUMENT.

The kernel handles this correctly — ext4_ext_map_blocks() simply
truncates m_len to EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN and lets the caller loop.  On
subsequent iterations, get_implied_cluster_alloc() detects that the
requested block falls within an already-allocated cluster by examining
adjacent extents, and returns the physical address without allocating a
new cluster.

I'll send a patch to fix ext_falloc_helper() so that when
cluster_ratio >= EXT_INIT_MAX_LEN, the allocation loop can create
multiple extents within the same cluster — skipping ext2fs_new_range()
and claim_range() for mid-cluster iterations where the physical blocks
are already claimed.

>
> However, the implementation of mkfs does not seem to respect this
> constraint and instead directly uses static macros to limit the
> user-specified cluster size.
>
>   #define EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE         10      /* 1024 */
>   #define EXT2_MIN_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE       EXT2_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE
>   #define EXT2_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE       29      /* 512MB  */

I was going to set EXT2_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE to 28 to align with the
kernel's EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE.

>
> This is confusing, or perhaps I missed something. If I understand
> correctly, users can now format an image with a maximum cluster size of
> 512 MB (I tried it, and it worked).


Yes, a 512M cluster size also works correctly on the current kernel.
The upper limit on cluster size here is to avoid the 32-bit overflow issue
that Sashiko mentioned — theoretically the maximum could be 512M.

It's just that the old mke2fs documentation originally specified 256M as
the intended maximum, so both the kernel and e2fsprogs target 256M as the
upper limit. If anyone prefers 512M, I'm happy to change it.

>  If the kernel's
> EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE is limited to 28, this would cause such
> existing images to become unmountable, even though I don't think images
> with such a large cluster size actually exist in practice. Therefore,
> I'm not sure this is safe.
>
> [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/mke2fs.8.html
>

I personally don't think such images are likely to exist in practice,
since formatting with the default 4K block size would already fail.


Thanks,
Baokun

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ext4: reduce max cluster size to match documented 256MB limit

[Jan Kara]

On Mon 08-06-26 19:11:49, Baokun Li wrote:
> The mke2fs man page documents:
> 
>   Valid cluster-size values are from 2048 to 256M bytes per cluster.
> 
> but EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE was set to 30 (1GB), allowing crafted
> filesystem images to specify cluster sizes up to 1GB.
> 
> On 32-bit systems with bigalloc enabled, the consistency check in
> ext4_handle_clustersize():
> 
>   s_blocks_per_group == s_clusters_per_group * (clustersize / blocksize)
> 
> can overflow when the cluster ratio is large enough. Since
> s_blocks_per_group is not range-checked in the bigalloc path, the
> wrapped product can pass the consistency check, leading to inconsistent
> group geometry and potential out-of-bounds block allocation.
> 
> Reduce EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE to 28 to match the documented 256MB
> limit. With this cap, the maximum product is:
> 
>   (blocksize * 8) * (256M / blocksize) = 2^31
> 
> which fits safely in a 32-bit unsigned long for all block sizes.
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

I guess I'll leave it up to Ted to decide whether 28 or 29 in the right
value. Both are fine with me if we are consistent with them :)

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 94283a991e5c..11e41a864db8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ struct ext4_io_submit {
>  #define	EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE		65536
>  #define EXT4_MIN_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE		10
>  #define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_LOG_SIZE		16
> -#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE	30
> +#define EXT4_MAX_CLUSTER_LOG_SIZE	28
>  #ifdef __KERNEL__
>  # define EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(s)		((s)->s_blocksize)
>  #else
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per block

[Baokun Li]

If s_inodes_per_group is not a multiple of s_inodes_per_block, the
division that computes s_itb_per_group truncates, reserving fewer blocks
for the inode table than needed.

On a crafted filesystem image, this allows __ext4_get_inode_loc() to
compute a block offset beyond the inode table, reading unrelated data as
an inode structure.

Add the missing divisibility check alongside the existing validation in
ext4_block_group_meta_init().

Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 3ddcb4a8d4db..5ec9e1ef00c0 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -5306,7 +5306,8 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
 	}
 	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
 	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
-	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
+	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7 ||
+	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group % sbi->s_inodes_per_block) {
 		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
 			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
 		return -EINVAL;
-- 
2.43.7

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per block

[Andreas Dilger]

On Jun 8, 2026, at 05:11, Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> 
> If s_inodes_per_group is not a multiple of s_inodes_per_block, the
> division that computes s_itb_per_group truncates, reserving fewer blocks
> for the inode table than needed.
> 
> On a crafted filesystem image, this allows __ext4_get_inode_loc() to
> compute a block offset beyond the inode table, reading unrelated data as
> an inode structure.
> 
> Add the missing divisibility check alongside the existing validation in
> ext4_block_group_meta_init().
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks good.  Is this also fixed/checked in e2fsprogs?  There is really no reason *not* to use all the space in the last itable block for inodes.

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca <mailto:adilger@dilger.ca>>

> ---
> fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 3ddcb4a8d4db..5ec9e1ef00c0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -5306,7 +5306,8 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb,
>  	}
>  	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
>  	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> -	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7 ||
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group % sbi->s_inodes_per_block) {
>  		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 


Cheers, Andreas

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per block

[Baokun Li]

On 2026/6/9 02:27, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2026, at 05:11, Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>> If s_inodes_per_group is not a multiple of s_inodes_per_block, the
>> division that computes s_itb_per_group truncates, reserving fewer blocks
>> for the inode table than needed.
>>
>> On a crafted filesystem image, this allows __ext4_get_inode_loc() to
>> compute a block offset beyond the inode table, reading unrelated data as
>> an inode structure.
>>
>> Add the missing divisibility check alongside the existing validation in
>> ext4_block_group_meta_init().
>>
>> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
>> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Hi Andreas,

Thank you for your review!

> Looks good.  Is this also fixed/checked in e2fsprogs?  
Yes, a similar patchset adding analogous checks to e2fsprogs is also in
the works.
> There is really no reason *not* to use all the space in the last itable block for inodes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca <mailto:adilger@dilger.ca>>

Indeed. Images created by mke2fs do not exhibit this issue; it only
occurs with certain crafted, malformed images. Thanks, Baokun

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per block

[Zhang Yi]

On 6/8/2026 7:11 PM, Baokun Li wrote:
> If s_inodes_per_group is not a multiple of s_inodes_per_block, the
> division that computes s_itb_per_group truncates, reserving fewer blocks
> for the inode table than needed.
> 
> On a crafted filesystem image, this allows __ext4_get_inode_loc() to
> compute a block offset beyond the inode table, reading unrelated data as
> an inode structure.
> 
> Add the missing divisibility check alongside the existing validation in
> ext4_block_group_meta_init().
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

> ---
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 3ddcb4a8d4db..5ec9e1ef00c0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -5306,7 +5306,8 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
>  	}
>  	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
>  	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> -	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7 ||
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group % sbi->s_inodes_per_block) {
>  		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ext4: reject mount if inodes per group is not a multiple of inodes per block

[Jan Kara]

On Mon 08-06-26 19:11:50, Baokun Li wrote:
> If s_inodes_per_group is not a multiple of s_inodes_per_block, the
> division that computes s_itb_per_group truncates, reserving fewer blocks
> for the inode table than needed.
> 
> On a crafted filesystem image, this allows __ext4_get_inode_loc() to
> compute a block offset beyond the inode table, reading unrelated data as
> an inode structure.
> 
> Add the missing divisibility check alongside the existing validation in
> ext4_block_group_meta_init().
> 
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260608061112.392391-1-libaokun%40linux.alibaba.com
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>

Looks good. Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/ext4/super.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
> index 3ddcb4a8d4db..5ec9e1ef00c0 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
> @@ -5306,7 +5306,8 @@ static int ext4_block_group_meta_init(struct super_block *sb, int silent)
>  	}
>  	if (sbi->s_inodes_per_group < sbi->s_inodes_per_block ||
>  	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group > sb->s_blocksize * 8 ||
> -	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7) {
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group & 7 ||
> +	    sbi->s_inodes_per_group % sbi->s_inodes_per_block) {
>  		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "invalid inodes per group: %lu",
>  			 sbi->s_inodes_per_group);
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -- 
> 2.43.7
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR