From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
aivazian.tigran@gmail.com, Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
<linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v5 17/20] ext4: Fix data integrity writeout issues in nojournal mode
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 12:49:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727104923.3828017-37-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727101509.21667-1-jack@suse.cz>
Several racing fsyncs on ext4 in nojournal mode could result in some
fsync returning earlier than all metadata buffers were properly
persisted. Also ext4_fsync() in nojournal mode was somewhat inefficient
because it was always writing out the inode regardless whether it was
dirty or not.
Fix these issues by using new .sync_inode_metadata method which makes
sure all inode related metadata is written to disk during any
WB_SYNC_ALL writeback in nojournal mode. This also somewhat simplifies
the nojournal mode fsync handling.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
fs/ext4/fsync.c | 28 +++------------
fs/ext4/inode.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
fs/ext4/super.c | 7 +++-
4 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 64f8f63f4415..0f06155a35a6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -3166,6 +3166,7 @@ extern struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
__ext4_iget((sb), (ino), (flags), __func__, __LINE__)
extern int ext4_write_inode(struct inode *, struct writeback_control *);
+extern int ext4_sync_inode_metadata(struct inode *, struct writeback_control *);
extern int ext4_setattr(struct mnt_idmap *, struct dentry *,
struct iattr *);
extern u32 ext4_dio_alignment(struct inode *inode);
diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index b7ea4433f4be..2999c2cc8fcf 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
@@ -46,7 +46,6 @@
static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
{
struct dentry *dentry, *next;
- struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb;
int ret = 0;
if (!ext4_test_inode_state(inode, EXT4_STATE_NEWENTRY))
@@ -69,12 +68,6 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
* through ext4_evict_inode()) and so we are safe to flush
* metadata blocks and the inode.
*/
- mmb = ext4_i_metadata_bhs(inode);
- if (mmb) {
- ret = mmb_sync(mmb);
- if (ret)
- break;
- }
ret = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
if (ret)
break;
@@ -87,22 +80,11 @@ static int ext4_fsync_nojournal(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
int datasync, bool *needs_barrier)
{
struct inode *inode = file->f_inode;
- struct writeback_control wbc = {
- .sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL,
- .nr_to_write = 0,
- };
int ret;
- ret = mmb_fsync_noflush(file, ext4_i_metadata_bhs(inode),
- start, end, datasync);
+ ret = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
if (ret)
return ret;
-
- /* Force writeout of inode table buffer to disk */
- ret = ext4_write_inode(inode, &wbc);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
ret = ext4_sync_parent(inode);
if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, BARRIER))
@@ -160,6 +142,10 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
if (sb_rdonly(inode->i_sb))
goto out;
+ ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
if (!EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal) {
ret = ext4_fsync_nojournal(file, start, end, datasync,
&needs_barrier);
@@ -168,10 +154,6 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
goto out;
}
- ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
- if (ret)
- goto out;
-
/*
* The caller's filemap_fdatawrite()/wait will sync the data.
* Metadata is in the journal, we wait for proper transaction to
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index e6acef486ee1..7a1f961cd11c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5799,6 +5799,10 @@ static int ext4_do_update_inode(handle_t *handle,
* ext4_mark_inode_dirty(). This is a correctness thing for WB_SYNC_ALL
* writeback.
*
+ * For nojournal mode all the work is done in ext4_sync_inode_metadata()
+ * because inode content is already copied into raw inode buffer and inode
+ * is marked with I_METADATA_WRITEBACK.
+ *
* Note that we are absolutely dependent upon all inode dirtiers doing the
* right thing: they *must* call mark_inode_dirty() after dirtying info in
* which we are interested.
@@ -5824,42 +5828,54 @@ int ext4_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
if (unlikely(err))
return err;
- if (EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal) {
- if (ext4_journal_current_handle()) {
- ext4_debug("called recursively, non-PF_MEMALLOC!\n");
- dump_stack();
- return -EIO;
- }
+ if (!EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal)
+ return 0;
- /*
- * No need to force transaction in WB_SYNC_NONE mode. Also
- * ext4_sync_fs() will force the commit after everything is
- * written.
- */
- if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->for_sync)
- return 0;
+ if (ext4_journal_current_handle()) {
+ ext4_debug("called recursively, non-PF_MEMALLOC!\n");
+ dump_stack();
+ return -EIO;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * No need to force transaction in WB_SYNC_NONE mode. Also
+ * ext4_sync_fs() will force the commit after everything is
+ * written.
+ */
+ if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->for_sync)
+ return 0;
- err = ext4_fc_commit(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal,
+ return ext4_fc_commit(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal,
EXT4_I(inode)->i_sync_tid);
- } else {
- struct ext4_iloc iloc;
+}
+
+int ext4_sync_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
+{
+ struct ext4_iloc iloc;
+ struct mapping_metadata_bhs *mmb;
+ int err;
- err = __ext4_get_inode_loc_noinmem(inode, &iloc);
+ /* We should only get here in nojournal mode */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal))
+ return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+
+ err = __ext4_get_inode_loc_noinmem(inode, &iloc);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+ mmb = READ_ONCE(EXT4_I(inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
+ if (mmb) {
+ err = mmb_sync(mmb);
if (err)
- return err;
- /*
- * sync(2) will flush the whole buffer cache. No need to do
- * it here separately for each inode.
- */
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL && !wbc->for_sync)
- sync_dirty_buffer(iloc.bh);
- if (buffer_req(iloc.bh) && !buffer_uptodate(iloc.bh)) {
- ext4_error_inode_block(inode, iloc.bh->b_blocknr, EIO,
- "IO error syncing inode");
- err = -EIO;
- }
- brelse(iloc.bh);
+ goto out;
}
+ sync_dirty_buffer(iloc.bh);
+ if (buffer_write_io_error(iloc.bh)) {
+ ext4_error_inode_block(inode, iloc.bh->b_blocknr, EIO,
+ "IO error syncing inode");
+ err = -EIO;
+ }
+out:
+ brelse(iloc.bh);
return err;
}
@@ -6407,6 +6423,20 @@ int ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle_t *handle,
/* ext4_do_update_inode() does jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata */
err = ext4_do_update_inode(handle, inode, iloc);
put_bh(iloc->bh);
+ /*
+ * Mark that there's metadata writeout pending for the inode so that it
+ * gets properly flushed on fsync(2) and similar.
+ */
+ if (!EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_journal) {
+ /*
+ * Inode didn't need to go through dirtying, make sure it is
+ * attached to wb so that writeback can handle it.
+ */
+ spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+ inode_attach_wb(inode, NULL);
+ spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
+ set_inode_metadata_writeback(inode);
+ }
return err;
}
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 8671fa1209dd..ae33f5bcb133 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -1608,9 +1608,13 @@ static int ext4_nfs_commit_metadata(struct inode *inode)
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_ALL
};
+ int ret;
trace_ext4_nfs_commit_metadata(inode);
- return ext4_write_inode(inode, &wbc);
+ ret = ext4_write_inode(inode, &wbc);
+ if (!ret && inode_state_read_once(inode) & I_METADATA_WRITEBACK)
+ ret = ext4_sync_inode_metadata(inode, &wbc);
+ return ret;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
@@ -1667,6 +1671,7 @@ static const struct super_operations ext4_sops = {
.free_inode = ext4_free_in_core_inode,
.destroy_inode = ext4_destroy_inode,
.write_inode = ext4_write_inode,
+ .sync_inode_metadata = ext4_sync_inode_metadata,
.dirty_inode = ext4_dirty_inode,
.drop_inode = ext4_drop_inode,
.evict_inode = ext4_evict_inode,
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 10:49 [PATCH v5 0/20] fs: Fix missed inode write during fsync Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 01/20] affs: Drop support for metadata bh tracking Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 02/20] fs: Fix possible UAF in mark_buffer_write_io_error() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 03/20] fs: Fix missed inode writeback when racing with __writeback_single_inode Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 04/20] ext4: Allocate mapping_metadata_bhs struct on demand Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 05/20] fs: Provide way for filesystem to wait for metadata writeback Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 06/20] ext2: Fix lost inode updates for IS_SYNC inodes Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 07/20] ext2: Drop __ext2_write_inode() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 08/20] ext2: Avoid unnecessary inode buffer writeback for sync(2) Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 09/20] ext2: Fix data integrity writeout issues Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 10/20] udf: " Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 11/20] udf: Use sync_inode_metadata() to writeout IS_SYNC inode Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 12/20] udf: Drop udf_sync_inode() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 13/20] udf: Use sync_inode_metadata() in udf_evict_inode() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 14/20] udf: Fold udf_update_inode() into udf_write_inode() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 15/20] bfs: Fix data integrity writeout issues Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 16/20] minix: " Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 18/20] fat: Fix missed inode writeback during fsync(2) Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 19/20] fat: Replace fat_sync_inode() with sync_inode_metadata() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v5 20/20] vfs: Remove mmb_fsync() Jan Kara
2026-07-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v5 0/20] fs: Fix missed inode write during fsync Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727104923.3828017-37-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=aivazian.tigran@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox