From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
changfengnan@bytedance.com, kbusch@kernel.org,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
Konstantin Komarov <almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
libaokun@linux.alibaba.com, bfoster@redhat.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/22] iomap: release the folio batch on iomap callback failures
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 13:53:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729205304.GA2901224@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729192737.3190206-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 12:27:16PM -0700, Joanne Koong wrote:
> From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
>
> A sashiko review of an unrelated patch points out that the folio
> batch mechanism used for iomap zero range fails to release the batch
> in a couple error scenarios. If either calls to ->iomap_end() or
> ->iomap_begin() fail, the direct return paths bypass the batch
> cleanup.
>
> The ->iomap_end() case is not a practical issue at the moment
> because there is no user of the mechanism that returns an error from
> this path. The ->iomap_begin() case is theoretically possible
> because XFS can invoke the fill helper and error out at various
> points thereafter. This subtly complicates things because XFS does
> not transfer iomap_flags to the iomap data structure in the error
> path.
>
> To deal with both of these issues, first make sure to invoke the
> cleanup helper in the error path for either fs callback. Second,
> update the helper to clear the flag unconditionally and release the
> batch so long as it is populated. This more clearly delineates the
> purpose of the flag to control the I/O path and not necessarily the
> status of the fbatch, so add a comment around this as well.
>
> Reported-by: Sashiko <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Fixes: 395ed1ef0012 ("iomap: optional zero range dirty folio processing")
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Seems reasonable to me,
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v6.19
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
--D
> ---
> fs/iomap/iter.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/iomap/iter.c b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> index e4a29829591a..63617ec48250 100644
> --- a/fs/iomap/iter.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/iter.c
> @@ -6,12 +6,18 @@
> #include <linux/iomap.h>
> #include "trace.h"
>
> +/*
> + * Release the iter folio batch. Note that the iomap flag is meant to control
> + * the I/O path for the mapping and may not be set in error situations.
> + */
> static inline void iomap_iter_clean_fbatch(struct iomap_iter *iter)
> {
> - if (iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_FOLIO_BATCH) {
> + if (!iter->fbatch)
> + return;
> + iter->iomap.flags &= ~IOMAP_F_FOLIO_BATCH;
> + if (folio_batch_count(iter->fbatch)) {
> folio_batch_release(iter->fbatch);
> folio_batch_reinit(iter->fbatch);
> - iter->iomap.flags &= ~IOMAP_F_FOLIO_BATCH;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -79,7 +85,7 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> olen),
> advanced, iter->flags, &iter->iomap);
> if (ret < 0 && !advanced)
> - return ret;
> + goto error;
> }
>
> /* detect old return semantics where this would advance */
> @@ -110,7 +116,11 @@ int iomap_iter(struct iomap_iter *iter, const struct iomap_ops *ops)
> ret = ops->iomap_begin(iter->inode, iter->pos, iter->len, iter->flags,
> &iter->iomap, &iter->srcmap);
> if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> + goto error;
> iomap_iter_done(iter);
> return 1;
> +
> +error:
> + iomap_iter_clean_fbatch(iter);
> + return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.52.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 19:27 [PATCH v5 00/22] iomap: convert to in-iter iomap_next() model Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 01/22] iomap: release the folio batch on iomap callback failures Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 20:53 ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 02/22] iomap: split iomap_iter() logic into iomap_iter_next() Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 03/22] iomap: decouple simple direct I/O reads from iomap_dio_rw Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 04/22] iomap: use GFP_NOWAIT when application for iomap_dio_simple allocations Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 05/22] iomap: add ->iomap_next() Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 06/22] xfs: convert iomap ops to ->iomap_next() Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 07/22] btrfs: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 08/22] ntfs3: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 09/22] ntfs: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 10/22] ext4: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 11/22] erofs: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 12/22] zonefs: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 13/22] ext2: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 14/22] block: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 15/22] f2fs: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 16/22] gfs2: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 17/22] hpfs: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 18/22] fuse: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 19/22] exfat: " Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 20/22] iomap: remove ->iomap_begin()/->iomap_end() legacy path Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 21/22] iomap: pass iomap_iter_next_fn directly instead of struct iomap_ops Joanne Koong
2026-07-29 19:27 ` [PATCH v5 22/22] Documentation: iomap: update docs to reflect iomap_iter_next model Joanne Koong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729205304.GA2901224@frogsfrogsfrogs \
--to=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
--cc=almaz.alexandrovich@paragon-software.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=changfengnan@bytedance.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=xiang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox