From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>,
Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: fix readdir position truncation on 32-bit kernels
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2026 21:42:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260805214202.a644393ef2f28ffb30090ff4@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806022044.167962-3-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
On Thu, 6 Aug 2026 10:20:44 +0800 Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com> wrote:
> In ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the directory cookie position is
> rebuilt with
>
> ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset;
>
> `ctx->pos` is loff_t (signed 64-bit), while `sb->s_blocksize` is
> unsigned long. On 32-bit kernels unsigned long is 32-bit, so the mask
>
> ~(sb->s_blocksize - 1)
>
> is computed as a 32-bit unsigned value (e.g. 0xfffff000 for a 4 KiB
> block size). In the AND expression with the 64-bit `ctx->pos`, that
> unsigned operand is zero-extended to 64 bits per the usual arithmetic
> conversions, yielding 0x00000000fffff000. The high 32 bits of
> `ctx->pos` are silently cleared, even though directory size is
> allowed to exceed 4 GiB.
>
> When readdir() crosses the 4 GiB boundary on a 32-bit kernel the
> position is reset back into the first 4 GiB block, making the
> re-validation path re-enumerate already-returned dirents indefinitely.
>
> This is ocfs2_dir_foreach_blk_el(), the extent-list readdir path taken
> for all non-inline directories, so a directory large enough to cross
> 4 GiB reaches it.
>
> This is the same class of bug that commit 3dce5bb82c97 ("exfat: Fix
> bitwise operation having different size") fixed in exfat, and the
> fix mirrors the equivalent ext4 fix in this series. Cast the operand
> to loff_t so the mask is 64-bit before the AND:
>
> ctx->pos = (ctx->pos & ~((loff_t)sb->s_blocksize - 1)) | offset;
>
> 64-bit kernels are unaffected.
AI review had no comment on your change, but it might have found a
bunch of unrelated ocfs2 issues:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806022044.167962-1-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 4:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 2:20 [PATCH 0/2] fs: fix readdir position truncation on 32-bit kernels Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-06 2:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] ext4: " Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-06 9:49 ` Jan Kara
2026-08-06 2:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] ocfs2: " Zhan Xusheng
2026-08-06 4:42 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2026-08-06 10:23 ` Joseph Qi
2026-08-06 4:39 ` [PATCH 0/2] fs: " Andrew Morton
2026-08-06 12:19 ` Zhan Xusheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260805214202.a644393ef2f28ffb30090ff4@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@fasheh.com \
--cc=ocfs2-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox