From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matthias Goergens" <matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: compensate ea_inode refs and free block on new xattr block write error
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:07:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817100724.923291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817095421.1171145-1-matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] The patch introduces calls to `mb_cache_entry_delete_or_get()` and `mb_cache_entry_wait_unused()`, which are not defined anywhere in the Linux kernel codebase. This will cause compilation and linking failures due to implicit function declarations and undefined symbols.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] ext4: compensate ea_inode refs and free block on new xattr block write error ---
commit 867eb1668b3595297e1515877804d2ee15fc4038
Author: Matthias Goergens <matthias.goergens@gmail.com>
ext4: compensate ea_inode refs and free block on new xattr block write error
This commit adds error handling in ext4_xattr_block_set() to properly revert
the on-disk reference counts and free the newly allocated xattr block if
metadata dirtying fails. It introduces ext4_xattr_new_block_fail() to handle
mbcache cleanup, block freeing, and quota release.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20260814070432.595B91F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org/
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> index 6127e94ea4f5d..f49d1e74e3214 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1299,6 +1299,63 @@ ext4_xattr_release_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> return;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Undo the setup of a new xattr block that failed to be written out: drop
> + * the ext4_xattr_inode_inc_ref_all() references, free the block, and
> + * release the quota this operation charged for the new value (quota_len,
> + * zero when the value is not in an EA inode).
> + */
> +static void ext4_xattr_new_block_fail(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> + struct buffer_head *new_bh,
> + size_t quota_len, int error)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + lock_buffer(new_bh);
> +retry_owner:
> + if (le32_to_cpu(BHDR(new_bh)->h_refcount) != 1) {
> + unlock_buffer(new_bh);
> + return;
> + }
> + if (ea_block_cache) {
> + oe = mb_cache_entry_delete_or_get(ea_block_cache,
> + le32_to_cpu(BHDR(new_bh)->h_hash),
> + new_bh->b_blocknr);
> + if (oe) {
> + unlock_buffer(new_bh);
> + mb_cache_entry_wait_unused(oe);
[Severity: Low]
Are mb_cache_entry_delete_or_get() and mb_cache_entry_wait_unused() defined
anywhere in the kernel codebase?
Building the kernel with EXT4 support enabled will likely fail to compile
or link because these required mbcache functions appear to be missing.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817095421.1171145-1-matthias.goergens@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-12 4:45 [PATCH 1/1] ext4: drop extra ea_inode ref in cached-block reuse path Matthias Goergens
2026-08-12 5:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-14 6:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Matthias Goergens
2026-08-14 7:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 9:54 ` [PATCH] ext4: compensate ea_inode refs and free block on new xattr block write error Matthias Goergens
2026-08-17 10:07 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17 11:49 ` Matthias Goergens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817100724.923291F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.goergens@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox