From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@kernel.org>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna@kernel.org>,
tytso@mit.edu, "Chuck Lever" <cel@kernel.org>,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] filemap: Remove FGP_NOFS
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 04:27:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830042742.84E321F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830041901.2668-10-willy@infradead.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Undeclared identifier 'FGP_NOFS' causes compilation failure in f2fs, and trivial removal introduces a filesystem reclaim deadlock.
--
commit 1683abf08ae4fef5fa05b44d804e2e0ac6771ec5
Author: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
filemap: Remove FGP_NOFS
This commit removes the FGP_NOFS flag and its associated __GFP_FS clearing
logic, stating that there are no more users of it.
> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> index 3974b063a0496..bff8b7264fb02 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
[ ... ]
> @@ -710,11 +709,10 @@ typedef unsigned int __bitwise fgf_t;
> #define FGP_LOCK ((__force fgf_t)0x00000002)
> #define FGP_CREAT ((__force fgf_t)0x00000004)
> #define FGP_WRITE ((__force fgf_t)0x00000008)
> -#define FGP_NOFS ((__force fgf_t)0x00000010)
[Severity: Low]
Does this removal break the build for f2fs?
Looking at f2fs_write_begin() in fs/f2fs/data.c, it still relies on the
removed FGP_NOFS flag:
folio = f2fs_filemap_get_folio(mapping, index,
FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_NOFS,
mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 6afec636881fb..e6580291f2185 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1994,8 +1994,6 @@ struct folio *__filemap_get_folio_mpol(struct address_space *mapping,
>
> if ((fgp_flags & FGP_WRITE) && mapping_can_writeback(mapping))
> gfp |= __GFP_WRITE;
> - if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOFS)
> - gfp &= ~__GFP_FS;
[Severity: Low]
If the build failure is trivially fixed by simply deleting FGP_NOFS from
f2fs_write_begin() without adding a memalloc_nofs_save() wrapper, will this
introduce an ABBA deadlock during direct reclaim?
Because __filemap_get_folio_mpol() no longer clears __GFP_FS, this could
allow __GFP_FS to bleed into the allocator while f2fs calls this holding
internal filesystem locks.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260830041901.2668-1-willy@infradead.org?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 4:18 [PATCH 0/9] Remove FGP_NOFS Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: Improve memalloc_nofs_save() documentation Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 2/9] ext4: Remove uses of FGP_NOFS Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 3/9] erofs: Remove redundant FGP_NOFS Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 4/9] nfs: " Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 5/9] ntfs: Remove FGP_NOFS from __ntfs_inode_resident_attr_pwrite() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 6/9] ntfs: Remove redundant FGP_NOFS from ntfs_wof_collect_dest() Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 7/9] squashfs: Remove use of FGP_NOFS Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 8/9] filemap: Remove redundant FGP_NOFS Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-30 4:18 ` [PATCH 9/9] filemap: Remove FGP_NOFS Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
2026-08-30 4:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-30 4:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830042742.84E321F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox