From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: MarkLee131 <kaixuanli0131@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: don't read past the UAPI struct in EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2026 15:30:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260917153002.AAFFF1F00898@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260917151949.415967-1-kaixuan.li@ntu.edu.sg>
> From: Kaixuan Li <kaixuanli0131@gmail.com>
>
> EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD casts the user pointer to struct ext4_new_group_input,
> its UAPI type, but sizes the copy by struct ext4_new_group_data, the
> internal type:
>
> struct ext4_new_group_data input;
>
> if (copy_from_user(&input, (struct ext4_new_group_input __user *)arg,
> sizeof(input)))
>
> The UAPI struct is 40 bytes, the internal one 48. A caller that follows
> the UAPI and allocates 40 bytes gets 8 bytes read past its object, and the
> ioctl returns EFAULT when those bytes are unmapped. The internal struct
> has carried the extra fields since ext4 was split from ext3, so the copy
> has always over-read the UAPI object.
>
> The two extra fields are not used from this path: free_clusters_count is
> overwritten by verify_group_input(), and mdata_blocks is used only by
> ext4_resize_fs(), which builds its own group_data array. The compat path
> already copies the six UAPI fields individually; the native path does not.
>
> Copy the UAPI struct, then set the internal fields from it.
>
> Reproducible on v6.12.9 and v7.2.4 by placing a 40-byte struct at the end
> of a mapped page whose successor is unmapped: the ioctl returns EFAULT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kaixuan Li <kaixuanli0131@gmail.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260917151949.415967-1-kaixuan.li@ntu.edu.sg?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-17 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-17 15:19 [PATCH] ext4: don't read past the UAPI struct in EXT4_IOC_GROUP_ADD MarkLee131
2026-09-17 15:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-17 19:46 ` Andreas Dilger
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-17 15:14 MarkLee131
2026-09-17 15:25 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260917153002.AAFFF1F00898@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=kaixuanli0131@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox