linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sandeep Dhavale" <dhavale@google.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix race between inline dir conversion and folio read
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 03:06:58 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260918030659.29DB31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260918025416.604297-1-dhavale@google.com>

> Commit 90f097b1403f ("ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and
> new directory codepaths") moved directory block initialization in
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock() into ext4_init_dirblock(), unlocking
> data_bh before setting BH_Uptodate.
> 
> When block size is smaller than PAGE_SIZE, multiple buffer heads share a
> single block device folio. If a concurrent read on that folio runs via
> block_read_full_folio() while data_bh is unlocked and not uptodate, it
> locks data_bh and submits a disk read for the uninitialized block.
> 
> Because ext4_init_dirblock() initializes bh->b_data without holding the
> buffer lock, the disk read races with and overwrites the initialized
> directory entries and checksum tail, corrupting the directory block:
> 
>   EXT4-fs warning: ext4_dirblock_csum_verify:375: inode #...:
>     No space for directory leaf checksum. Please run e2fsck -D.
>   EXT4-fs error: __ext4_find_entry:1626: inode #...:
>     checksumming directory block 0
> 
> To fix this, mark data_bh uptodate before unlocking it in
> ext4_convert_inline_data_nolock(), just like the regular file path
> does. Additionally, hold lock_buffer(bh) in ext4_init_dirblock() while
> populating the directory entries and checksum tail so any buffer
> modifications are properly serialized.
> 
> Fixes: 90f097b1403f ("ext4: refactor the inline directory conversion and new directory codepaths")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: Antigravity:gemini-3.8-flash
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Dhavale <dhavale@google.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260918025416.604297-1-dhavale@google.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-18  3:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-18  2:54 [PATCH] ext4: fix race between inline dir conversion and folio read Sandeep Dhavale
2026-09-18  3:06 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-24  9:37 ` liuderong
2026-09-24 16:18 ` Jan Kara
2026-09-24 23:12   ` Sandeep Dhavale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260918030659.29DB31F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhavale@google.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).