From: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
Yuezhang Mo <yuezhang.mo@sony.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] fs: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:05:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924110544.601390-1-yaojiale02@163.com> (raw)
An asynchronous direct write can remain in flight after its submitting
thread releases the inode lock. If another direct write falls back to
buffered I/O in the meantime, the buffered write can dirty page cache
before the first write completes post-I/O invalidation. The invalidation
then finds dirty pages, emits a page cache invalidation failure warning,
and records -EIO in the mapping error sequence. A later fsync() returns
-EIO.
Commit 15cdefd0c0522f9d5e12d947fa04f4c11649b699 ("ext4: drain
in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback") fixed this race in ext4.
The same ordering is missing from the buffered fallback paths in ext2,
NTFS, and exFAT.
This series adds inode_dio_wait() before each fallback dirties page cache.
Each patch fixes one filesystem and remains independently buildable.
A reproducer using concurrent AIO direct writes and buffered fallback
triggered the following warning on all three filesystems and made a
subsequent fsync() return -EIO:
Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O. Possible data corruption
due to collision with buffered I/O!
Jiale Yao (3):
ext2: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
ntfs: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
exfat: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
fs/exfat/file.c | 6 ++++++
fs/ext2/file.c | 7 +++++++
fs/ntfs/file.c | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-09-24 11:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-24 11:05 Jiale Yao [this message]
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext2: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] ntfs: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 12:04 ` liubaolin
2026-09-24 12:20 ` jiale yao
2026-09-26 7:29 ` jiale yao
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] exfat: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260924110544.601390-1-yaojiale02@163.com \
--to=yaojiale02@163.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=exfat@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
--cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox