Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
	Yuezhang Mo <yuezhang.mo@sony.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	exfat@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Jiale Yao <yaojiale02@163.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] fs: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:05:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260924110544.601390-1-yaojiale02@163.com> (raw)

An asynchronous direct write can remain in flight after its submitting
thread releases the inode lock.  If another direct write falls back to
buffered I/O in the meantime, the buffered write can dirty page cache
before the first write completes post-I/O invalidation.  The invalidation
then finds dirty pages, emits a page cache invalidation failure warning,
and records -EIO in the mapping error sequence.  A later fsync() returns
-EIO.

Commit 15cdefd0c0522f9d5e12d947fa04f4c11649b699 ("ext4: drain
in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback") fixed this race in ext4.
The same ordering is missing from the buffered fallback paths in ext2,
NTFS, and exFAT.

This series adds inode_dio_wait() before each fallback dirties page cache.
Each patch fixes one filesystem and remains independently buildable.

A reproducer using concurrent AIO direct writes and buffered fallback
triggered the following warning on all three filesystems and made a
subsequent fsync() return -EIO:

  Page cache invalidation failure on direct I/O.  Possible data corruption
  due to collision with buffered I/O!

Jiale Yao (3):
  ext2: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
  ntfs: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback
  exfat: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback

 fs/exfat/file.c | 6 ++++++
 fs/ext2/file.c  | 7 +++++++
 fs/ntfs/file.c  | 7 +++++++
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+)

-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2026-09-24 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-24 11:05 Jiale Yao [this message]
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext2: drain in-flight DIO before buffered write fallback Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 2/3] ntfs: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-24 12:04   ` liubaolin
2026-09-24 12:20     ` jiale yao
2026-09-26  7:29     ` jiale yao
2026-09-24 11:05 ` [PATCH 3/3] exfat: " Jiale Yao
2026-09-24 11:15   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260924110544.601390-1-yaojiale02@163.com \
    --to=yaojiale02@163.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=exfat@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=sj1557.seo@samsung.com \
    --cc=yuezhang.mo@sony.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox