Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Zhang Yi" <yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] mm/truncate: align truncation boundaries to mapping minimum folio order
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2026 12:31:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260928123136.2D6891F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260928120833.3440834-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] mm: integer overflow in round_up() during truncation causes complete file data loss
--

commit 583804d300760dcf60e3ec5aab6503a560ad3e7e
Author: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

mm/truncate: align truncation boundaries to mapping minimum folio order

When the mapping has a non-zero minimum folio order, this patch changes
folio_split() in truncate_inode_partial_folio() to stop at min_order instead
of order 0. It also aligns both start and end to the mapping minimum folio
order so they always fall on a folio boundary, preventing valid out-of-range
tails from being dropped.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAJnrk1bQYUe6+1ryyJur5EEnZYrC+_5AYsy=OWzVRgD4202y1g@mail.gmail.com/

> diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
> index b58ba940be474..8a28f4a212677 100644
> --- a/mm/truncate.c
> +++ b/mm/truncate.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -395,6 +397,10 @@ void truncate_inode_pages_range(struct address_space *mapping,
>  	else
>  		end = (lend + 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>  
> +	start = round_up(start, min_nrpages);

[Severity: Critical]
Could this round_up() result in an integer overflow that changes a very large
start index to 0 on 32-bit architectures?

When an unprivileged user issues fallocate(PUNCH_HOLE) or truncate at an offset
near ULONG_MAX << PAGE_SHIFT (e.g., 16TB on 32-bit systems) on a filesystem with
min_nrpages > 1 (like ext4 with large folio/iomap), start approaches
ULONG_MAX (e.g., 0xFFFFFFFF on 32-bit x86).

The macro round_up(start, min_nrpages) performs 32-bit arithmetic. With
start approaching 0xFFFFFFFF, start + min_nrpages - 1 can overflow to a value
less than min_nrpages, causing round_up to evaluate to 0.

This would corrupt the start index to 0 in truncate_inode_pages_range(), and
the subsequent loop would unintentionally truncate the entire page cache from
index 0 to end, causing complete data loss of unwritten data.

> +	if (end != (pgoff_t)-1)
> +		end = round_down(end, min_nrpages);
> +
>  	folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
>  	index = start;
>  	while (index < end && find_lock_entries(mapping, &index, end - 1,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260928120833.3440834-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-28 12:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-28 12:08 [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/truncate: fix data loss when truncating straddling large folios Zhang Yi
2026-09-28 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] mm/truncate: align truncation boundaries to mapping minimum folio order Zhang Yi
2026-09-28 12:31   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-28 12:46     ` Zhang Yi
2026-09-28 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] mm/truncate: look up the end-edge straddler by index Zhang Yi
2026-09-28 12:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] mm/truncate: fix data loss when splitting straddling large folios fails Zhang Yi
2026-09-28 12:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] mm/truncate: clarify return value of truncate_inode_partial_folio() Zhang Yi
2026-09-28 12:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-28 21:49 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] mm/truncate: fix data loss when truncating straddling large folios Andrew Morton
2026-09-29  8:35   ` Zhang Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260928123136.2D6891F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox