Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Qiliang Yuan" <odys.yuan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix shrinker scan budget accounting in ext4_es_scan()
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2026 07:50:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261001075025.124841F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261001-fix-ext4-es-scan-nr-scanned-v4-1-b13703714ce2@gmail.com>

> do_shrink_slab() reads count_objects() once per invocation to derive
> a one-shot scan budget, then calls scan_objects() repeatedly until
> that budget is exhausted or scan_objects() returns SHRINK_STOP.
> include/linux/shrinker.h documents that scan_objects() "should track
> its actual progress" in sc->nr_scanned, so do_shrink_slab() can tell
> when there is nothing left to examine and stop early.
> 
> ext4_es_scan() never updates sc->nr_scanned, so it defaults to the
> full sc->nr_to_scan on every call. do_shrink_slab() therefore always
> believes a full batch was examined, regardless of what __es_shrink()
> actually did, and keeps calling scan_objects() until the budget
> derived from the (possibly stale) percpu extent_status count is
> drained, even after sbi->s_es_list has nothing left to examine.
> 
> Make __es_shrink() report the number of extent_status objects it
> [ ... ]
>   after this patch    239                      1 (0.4%)
> 
> Fixes: 1ab6c4997e04 ("fs: convert fs shrinkers to new scan/count API")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Qiliang Yuan <odys.yuan@gmail.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261001-fix-ext4-es-scan-nr-scanned-v4-0-b13703714ce2@gmail.com?part=1


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-01  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-01  7:43 [PATCH v4 0/2] ext4: fix shrinker scan budget accounting, plus a related cleanup Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01  7:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] ext4: fix shrinker scan budget accounting in ext4_es_scan() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01  7:50   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-01  7:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ext4: remove unused locked_ei parameter from __es_shrink() Qiliang Yuan
2026-10-01  7:49   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261001075025.124841F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=odys.yuan@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox