Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andrey Albershteyn via Linux-f2fs-devel"
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, dsterba@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v17 12/21] xfs: use read ioend for fsverity data verification
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2026 01:34:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261003013423.33F4E1F00899@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002223705.2175542-13-aalbersh@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] xfs: deadlock in per-CPU bio completion due to mempool_alloc() with GFP_NOFS
--

commit ea1a0b2023bf04b556e0f9d798eb8d673f0e72ca
Author: Andrey Albershteyn via Linux-f2fs-devel <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>

xfs: use read ioend for fsverity data verification

This commit uses read ioends for fsverity verification, moving fsverity
metadata I/O to a separate workqueue to avoid deadlocks. It passes
fsverity_info from the iomap context down to the ioend and adds a helper to
check for file data.

> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> index 19640e4e3ed12..a36f840884b49 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -623,11 +624,13 @@ static const struct iomap_read_ops xfs_iomap_read_ops = {
>  
>  static inline const struct iomap_read_ops *
>  xfs_get_iomap_read_ops(
> -	const struct address_space	*mapping)
> +	const struct address_space	*mapping,
> +	loff_t				pos)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_inode		*ip = XFS_I(mapping->host);
>  
> -	if (bdev_has_integrity_csum(xfs_inode_buftarg(ip)->bt_bdev))
> +	if (bdev_has_integrity_csum(xfs_inode_buftarg(ip)->bt_bdev) ||
> +	    xfs_fsverity_is_file_data(ip, pos))
>  		return &xfs_iomap_read_ops;

[Severity: High]
Does this logic route fsverity metadata reads through xfs_iomap_read_ops if
the block device has integrity checksums? 

Using xfs_iomap_read_ops causes xfs_bio_submit_read() to call
xfs_ioend_submit_read(), which sets BIO_COMPLETE_IN_TASK on the bio. This
means the completions for these metadata reads will be queued to the per-CPU
bio completion worker.

>  	return &iomap_bio_read_ops;
>  }

[ ... ]
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioend.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioend.c
> index e70be5b86f0b7..f4c1bbc03714f 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_ioend.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_ioend.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -117,6 +138,24 @@ xfs_end_io_read(
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If we have fsverity on this bio, we need to run fsverity verification
> +	 * of data folios from a separate fsverity workqueue. This is necessary
> +	 * to avoid deadlocking due to fsverity issuing more reads of fsverity
> +	 * metadata which would be processed by the same worker in the BIO
> +	 * completion workqueue.
> +	 */
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FS_VERITY) && !error && ioend->io_vi &&
> +			xfs_fsverity_is_file_data(ip, ioend->io_offset)) {
> +		fsv_ioend = mempool_alloc(&xfs_fsverity_ioend_pool,
> +				GFP_NOFS);

[Severity: High]
Can this result in an ABBA deadlock under memory pressure?

If the memory pool is empty, mempool_alloc() with GFP_NOFS will sleep and
block the per-CPU bio completion worker in xfs_end_io_read().

As noted in xfs_get_iomap_read_ops() above, if the block device has integrity
checksums enabled, fsverity metadata reads will use xfs_iomap_read_ops
and their completions will also be queued to this same per-CPU bio completion
worker.

Since this worker could be blocked in mempool_alloc() waiting for the
fsverity workqueue to finish verifying data, and the fsverity workqueue
could concurrently be waiting on a metadata read completion that is queued on
this blocked worker, can this cause a hang?

> +		fsv_ioend->ioend = ioend;
> +		INIT_WORK(&fsv_ioend->work, xfs_end_fsverity_io_read);
> +
> +		fsverity_enqueue_verify_work(&fsv_ioend->work);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
>  	iomap_finish_ioends(ioend, error);
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261002223705.2175542-1-aalbersh@kernel.org?part=12

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-03  1:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-02 22:36 [PATCH v17 00/21] fs-verity support for XFS with post EOF merkle tree Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 01/21] fsverity: report validation errors through fserror to fsnotify Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 02/21] fsverity: expose ensure_fsverity_info() Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 03/21] fsverity: pass digest size and hash of the all-zeroes block to ->write Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 04/21] fsverity: hoist pagecache_read from f2fs/ext4 to fsverity Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 05/21] fsverity: don't allow setting DAX file attribute on fsverity files Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 06/21] fsverity: hoist statx reporting of fs-verity flag Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 07/21] xfs: introduce fsverity on-disk changes Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 08/21] xfs: don't allow to enable DAX on fs-verity sealed inode Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 09/21] xfs: disable direct read path for fs-verity files Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 10/21] xfs: don't report dio_mem_align and dio_offset_align for fsverity files Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 11/21] xfs: handle fsverity I/O in write/read path Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 12/21] xfs: use read ioend for fsverity data verification Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 13/21] xfs: add XFS_BMAPI_UNWRITTEN to unmap unwritten extents in __xfs_bunmapi() Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 14/21] xfs: don't remove written extents past EOF on fsverity inodes Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 15/21] xfs: add fs-verity support Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-05 17:18   ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-05 21:12     ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-10-06  9:03       ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 16/21] xfs: initialize fs-verity on file open Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 17/21] xfs: add fs-verity ioctls Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:36 ` [PATCH v17 18/21] xfs: advertise fs-verity being available on filesystem Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:37 ` [PATCH v17 19/21] xfs: check and repair the verity inode flag state Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:37 ` [PATCH v17 20/21] xfs: introduce health state for corrupted fsverity metadata Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 22:37 ` [PATCH v17 21/21] xfs: enable ro-compat fs-verity flag Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-03  1:34   ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-10-02 23:25 ` [PATCH v17 00/21] fs-verity support for XFS with post EOF merkle tree Eric Biggers
2026-10-03 12:07   ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-10-05 11:26     ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-10-05 13:30       ` Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261003013423.33F4E1F00899@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox