Linux EXT4 FS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Chris Mason <mason@kernel.org>,
	 linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>,
	 Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	 Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>,
	 Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>,
	 "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>,
	 Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
	 "Christian Brauner (Amutable)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 7/9] udf: don't allocate the inode block in udf_sync_inode_metadata()
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 14:28:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261029-work-inode-metadata_writeback-v1-7-7d6c678a585d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029-work-inode-metadata_writeback-v1-0-7d6c678a585d@kernel.org>

udf_sync_inode_metadata() looks up the block that holds the inode with
sb_getblk() which allocates a buffer for it if it isn't cached. But a
block that isn't in the buffer cache is neither dirty nor under
writeback. So there's nothing to write or to wait for and allocating a
buffer that just gets thrown away again is pointless.

It's also not something we can afford once inode eviction calls
->sync_inode_metadata() from reclaim. So look the block up with
sb_find_get_block_nonatomic() instead.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v7.3
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Amutable) <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 fs/udf/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/inode.c b/fs/udf/inode.c
index bacf2a86161e..59f8e9bde0b1 100644
--- a/fs/udf/inode.c
+++ b/fs/udf/inode.c
@@ -1744,23 +1744,22 @@ int udf_sync_inode_metadata(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
 	struct buffer_head *bh;
 	int err = 0;
 
-	bh = sb_getblk(inode->i_sb,
+	/* A block that isn't cached is neither dirty nor under writeback. */
+	bh = sb_find_get_block_nonatomic(inode->i_sb,
 			udf_get_lb_pblock(inode->i_sb,
 					  &UDF_I(inode)->i_location, 0));
-	if (!bh)
-		return -EIO;
-
-	sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
-	if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) {
-		udf_warn(inode->i_sb, "IO error syncing udf inode [%08llx]\n",
-			 inode->i_ino);
-		err = -EIO;
-		goto out;
+	if (bh) {
+		sync_dirty_buffer(bh);
+		if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) {
+			udf_warn(inode->i_sb, "IO error syncing udf inode [%08llx]\n",
+				 inode->i_ino);
+			err = -EIO;
+		}
+		brelse(bh);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 	}
-	err = mmb_sync(&UDF_I(inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
-out:
-	brelse(bh);
-	return err;
+	return mmb_sync(&UDF_I(inode)->i_metadata_bhs);
 }
 
 static void udf_adjust_time(struct udf_inode_info *iinfo, struct timespec64 time)

-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-10-29 13:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-29 13:28 [PATCH RFC 0/9] fs: reclaim inodes with I_METADATA_WRITEBACK Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 1/9] ext2: add ext2_inode_block() helper Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 2/9] ext2: don't read the inode block in ext2_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 3/9] ext4: add ext4_inode_loc_block() helper Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 4/9] ext4: don't read the inode block in ext4_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 5/9] minix: add minix_inode_block() helper Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 6/9] minix: don't read the inode block in minix_sync_inode_metadata() Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2026-10-29 13:35   ` [PATCH RFC 7/9] udf: don't allocate the inode block in udf_sync_inode_metadata() sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 8/9] fat: sync the inode in fat_free_eofblocks() Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 13:28 ` [PATCH RFC 9/9] fs: don't strand I_METADATA_WRITEBACK inodes outside the LRU Christian Brauner
2026-10-29 13:46   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261029-work-inode-metadata_writeback-v1-7-7d6c678a585d@kernel.org \
    --to=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox