From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>
Cc: ebiggers@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, fsverity@lists.linux.dev,
dsterba@suse.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
chao@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fsverity: strip FS_VERITY_FL from FS_IOC_SETFLAGS
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2026 11:26:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261106102618.GA5319@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105115532.613467-2-aalbersh@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 12:55:26PM +0100, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> The common use of FS_IOC_GETFLAGS/SETFLAGS is get-modify-set loop.
> Filesystems could return verity status with GETFLAGS, attempting to then
> pass FS_VERITY_FL to SETFLAGS is not allowed.
>
> The ext4 and f2fs already treat FS_VERITY_FL in the set path as no-op,
> however, BTRFS returns -EOPNOTSUPP. So, the modification of other flags
> doesn't work on BTRFS for fsverity inodes.
>
> Fix it for BTRFS and anyone else, the ext4 and f2fs masking becomes
> no-op. The file_get/setattr() path is fine here as this flag is cleared
> right before fileattr_set_prepare(). The future fsverity support in XFS
> would also need it.
>
> Cc: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
> Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Fixes: 146054090b08 ("btrfs: initial fsverity support")
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/file_attr.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/file_attr.c b/fs/file_attr.c
> index 833e03810b24..b43977d5f8e0 100644
> --- a/fs/file_attr.c
> +++ b/fs/file_attr.c
> @@ -199,6 +199,16 @@ static int fileattr_set_prepare(struct inode *inode,
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> + /*
> + * verity is settable only via FS_IOC_ENABLE_VERITY; never through
> + * fileattr
Maybe spell out FS_VERITY_FL above? Starting the sentence with a lower
case letter looks odd, and spelling out the flag name doens't hurt.
Otherwise looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-06 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 11:55 [PATCH v2 0/5] fsverity: lift ioctl() input masking and runtime inode flag to VFS Andrey Albershteyn
2026-11-05 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] fsverity: strip FS_VERITY_FL from FS_IOC_SETFLAGS Andrey Albershteyn
2026-11-05 12:03 ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2026-11-05 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] fsverity: add I_VERITY_BUILDING inode state flag Andrey Albershteyn
2026-11-05 12:03 ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-05 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] btrfs: use I_VERITY_BUILDING instead of private flags Andrey Albershteyn
2026-11-05 12:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 10:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-05 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ext4: " Andrey Albershteyn
2026-11-05 12:01 ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-11-05 11:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] f2fs: " Andrey Albershteyn
2026-11-05 12:03 ` [f2fs-dev] " sashiko-bot
2026-11-06 10:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261106102618.GA5319@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=boris@bur.io \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=fsverity@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox