From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A483FC04A6B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB0C2087F for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726259AbfEFLeE (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 07:34:04 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:51182 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725883AbfEFLeE (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 07:34:04 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x46BXt2a129155 for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 07:34:03 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2sajd249fe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 06 May 2019 07:33:58 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 6 May 2019 12:33:40 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 6 May 2019 12:33:38 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x46BXbHx29163602 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 May 2019 11:33:37 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F7AAE055; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:33:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55B6CAE051; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:33:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.70.42]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 6 May 2019 11:33:36 +0000 (GMT) From: Chandan Rajendra To: Eric Biggers Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] fscrypt: support encrypting multiple filesystem blocks per page Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 14:08:21 +0530 Organization: IBM In-Reply-To: <20190501224515.43059-7-ebiggers@kernel.org> References: <20190501224515.43059-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20190501224515.43059-7-ebiggers@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19050611-4275-0000-0000-00000331DF55 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19050611-4276-0000-0000-000038414616 Message-Id: <2173142.gu81EOElhA@dhcp-9-109-212-164> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-05-06_07:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1905060102 Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, May 2, 2019 4:15:08 AM IST Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Rename fscrypt_encrypt_page() to fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks() and > redefine its behavior to encrypt all filesystem blocks from the given > region of the given page, rather than assuming that the region consists > of just one filesystem block. Also remove the 'inode' and 'lblk_num' > parameters, since they can be retrieved from the page as it's already > assumed to be a pagecache page. > > This is in preparation for allowing encryption on ext4 filesystems with > blocksize != PAGE_SIZE. > > This is based on work by Chandan Rajendra. Looks good to me, Reviewed-by: Chandan Rajendra -- chandan