From: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, <tytso@mit.edu>,
<adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>, <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <yi.zhang@huawei.com>, <lihaotian9@huawei.com>,
<lutianxiong@huawei.com>, <linfeilong@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix bug for rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 16:57:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <24f6a6ff-bfa9-f0e6-1ab0-cf56222d0d40@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201229085609.1109598-1-yangerkun@huawei.com>
在 2020/12/29 16:56, yangerkun 写道:
> ext4_rename will create a special inode for whiteout and use this 'ino'
> to replace the source file's dir entry 'ino'. Once error happens
> latter(small ext4 img, and consume all space, so the rename with dst
> path not exist will fail due to the ENOSPC return from ext4_add_entry in
> ext4_rename), the cleanup do drop the nlink for whiteout, but forget to
> restore 'ino' with source file. This will lead to "deleted inode
> referenced".
>
> Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/namei.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/namei.c b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> index b17a082b7db1..0e89e5a0c758 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
> @@ -3593,9 +3593,6 @@ static int ext4_setent(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent,
> return retval2;
> }
> }
> - brelse(ent->bh);
> - ent->bh = NULL;
> -
> return retval;
> }
>
> @@ -3794,6 +3791,7 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> }
> }
>
> + old_file_type = old.de->file_type;
> if (IS_DIRSYNC(old.dir) || IS_DIRSYNC(new.dir))
> ext4_handle_sync(handle);
>
> @@ -3821,7 +3819,6 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> force_reread = (new.dir->i_ino == old.dir->i_ino &&
> ext4_test_inode_flag(new.dir, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA));
>
> - old_file_type = old.de->file_type;
> if (whiteout) {
> /*
> * Do this before adding a new entry, so the old entry is sure
> @@ -3919,15 +3916,18 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old_dir, struct dentry *old_dentry,
> retval = 0;
>
> end_rename:
> - brelse(old.dir_bh);
> - brelse(old.bh);
> - brelse(new.bh);
> if (whiteout) {
> + ext4_setent(handle, &old,
> + old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type);
> if (retval)
> drop_nlink(whiteout);
> unlock_new_inode(whiteout);
> iput(whiteout);
> +
This is a mistake... Will send v2.
> }
> + brelse(old.dir_bh);
> + brelse(old.bh);
> + brelse(new.bh);
> if (handle)
> ext4_journal_stop(handle);
> return retval;
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-29 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-29 8:56 [PATCH] ext4: fix bug for rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT yangerkun
2020-12-29 8:57 ` yangerkun [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=24f6a6ff-bfa9-f0e6-1ab0-cf56222d0d40@huawei.com \
--to=yangerkun@huawei.com \
--cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=lihaotian9@huawei.com \
--cc=linfeilong@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lutianxiong@huawei.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox