From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: ric@emc.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Abhishek Rai <abhishekrai@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rohitseth@google.com,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [CALL FOR TESTING] Make Ext3 fsck way faster [2.6.24-rc6 -mm patch]
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:08:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27941.1200460088@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:09:16 EST." <478CCC9C.4070507@emc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 532 bytes --]
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:09:16 EST, Ric Wheeler said:
> I actually think that the value of this kind of reduction is huge. We
> have seen fsck run for days (not just hours) which makes the "restore
> from backup" versus "fsck" decision favor the tapes...
Funny thing is that for many of these sorts of cases, "restore from backup"
is *also* a "days" issue unless you do a *lot* of very clever planning
ahead to be able to get multiple tape drives moving at the same time while
not causing issues at the receiving end either....
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-16 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200801140839.01986.abhishekrai@google.com>
2008-01-15 0:34 ` [CALL FOR TESTING] Make Ext3 fsck way faster [2.6.24-rc6 -mm patch] Andrew Morton
2008-01-15 11:04 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-15 13:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-15 13:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-01-15 15:28 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-17 12:47 ` Abhishek Rai
2008-01-20 4:10 ` Daniel Phillips
2008-01-21 2:51 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-24 19:04 ` Daniel Phillips
2008-01-15 15:09 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-01-16 5:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2008-01-16 4:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2008-01-17 11:36 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-01-20 3:55 ` Daniel Phillips
2008-01-23 9:12 Abhishek Rai
2008-01-24 7:49 ` Andrew Morton
2008-01-24 13:14 ` Abhishek Rai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27941.1200460088@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=abhishekrai@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ric@emc.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox