From: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
ojaswin@linux.ibm.com, zlang@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 11:42:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3376b6e7-9870-46dc-a22d-9879ec4d9c09@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024181444.GE2386201@frogsfrogsfrogs>
On 10/24/24 23:44, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 12:56:20AM +0530, Nirjhar Roy wrote:
>> This commit adds new tests that checks the behaviour of xfs/ext4
>> filesystems when extsize hint is set on file with inode size as 0, non-empty
>> files with allocated and delalloc extents and so on.
>> Although currently this test is placed under tests/generic, it
>> only runs on xfs and there is an ongoing patch series[1] to enable
>> extsize hints for ext4 as well.
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/cover.1726034272.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com/
>>
>> Suggested-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nirjhar Roy <nirjhar@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> tests/generic/365 | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> tests/generic/365.out | 26 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100755 tests/generic/365
>> create mode 100644 tests/generic/365.out
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/365 b/tests/generic/365
>> new file mode 100755
>> index 00000000..85a7ce9a
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/365
>> @@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
>> +#! /bin/bash
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +# Copyright (c) 2024 Nirjhar Roy (nirjhar@linux.ibm.com). All Rights Reserved.
>> +#
>> +# FS QA Test 365
>> +#
>> +# This test verifies that extent allocation hint setting works correctly on files with
>> +# no extents allocated and non-empty files which are truncated. It also checks that the
>> +# extent hints setting fails with non-empty file i.e, with any file with allocated
>> +# extents or delayed allocation. We also check if the extsize value and the
>> +# xflag bit actually got reflected after setting/re-setting the extsize value.
>> +
>> +. ./common/config
>> +. ./common/filter
>> +. ./common/preamble
>> +. ./common/xfs
>> +
>> +_begin_fstest ioctl quick
>> +
>> +_supported_fs xfs
>> +
>> +_fixed_by_kernel_commit XXXXXXXXXXXX \
>> + "xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize",
>> +
>> +_require_scratch
>> +
>> +FILE_DATA_SIZE=1M
> Do these tests work correctly with fsblock size of 64k? Just curious
> since Pankaj just sent a series doing 1M -> 4M bumps to fix quota
> issues.
Yes I have tested this with 2k, 4k, 16k, 64k on ppc64le and x86_64
>> +filter_extsz()
>> +{
>> + sed "s/$EXTSIZE/EXTSIZE/g"
>> +}
>> +
>> +setup()
>> +{
>> + _scratch_mkfs >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1
>> + _scratch_mount >> "$seqres.full" 2>&1
>> + BLKSZ=`_get_block_size $SCRATCH_MNT`
>> + EXTSIZE=$(( BLKSZ*2 ))
> Might want to check that there isn't an extsize/cowextsize set on the
> root directory due to mkfs options.
Noted.
>
>> +}
>> +
>> +read_file_extsize()
>> +{
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize" $1 | _filter_scratch | filter_extsz
>> +}
>> +
>> +check_extsz_and_xflag()
>> +{
>> + local filename=$1
>> + read_file_extsize $filename
>> + _test_xfs_xflags_field $filename "e" && echo "e flag set" || echo "e flag unset"
>> +}
>> +
>> +check_extsz_xflag_across_remount()
>> +{
>> + local filename=$1
>> + _scratch_cycle_mount
>> + check_extsz_and_xflag $filename
>> +}
>> +
>> +# Extsize flag should be cleared when extsize is reset, so this function
>> +# checks that this behavior is followed.
>> +reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag()
>> +{
>> + local filename=$1
>> + echo "Re-setting extsize hint to 0"
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG -c "extsize 0" $filename
>> + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
>> +}
>> +
>> +check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset()
>> +{
>> + local filename=$1
>> + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
>> + reset_extsz_and_recheck_extsz_xflag $filename
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_empty_file()
>> +{
>> + echo "TEST: Set extsize on empty file"
>> + local filename=$1
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG \
>> + -c "open -f $filename" \
>> + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \
>> +
>> + check_extsz_xflag_before_and_after_reset $filename
>> + echo
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_data_delayed()
>> +{
>> + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation"
>> + local filename=$1
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG \
>> + -c "open -f $filename" \
>> + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
>> + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch
>> +
>> + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
>> + echo
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_data_allocated()
>> +{
>> + echo "TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents"
>> + local filename=$1
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG \
>> + -c "open -f $filename" \
>> + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
>> + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" | _filter_scratch
>> +
>> + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
>> + echo
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_truncate_allocated()
>> +{
>> + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents"
>> + local filename=$1
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG \
>> + -c "open -f $filename" \
>> + -c "pwrite -qW 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
>> + -c "truncate 0" \
>> + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \
>> +
>> + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
>> + echo
>> +}
>> +
>> +test_truncate_delayed()
>> +{
>> + echo "TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation"
>> + local filename=$1
>> + $XFS_IO_PROG \
>> + -c "open -f $filename" \
>> + -c "pwrite -q 0 $FILE_DATA_SIZE" \
>> + -c "truncate 0" \
>> + -c "extsize $EXTSIZE" \
>> +
>> + check_extsz_xflag_across_remount $filename
>> + echo
>> +}
> Does this work for filesystems that don't have delalloc? Like fsdax
> filesystems?
>
> --D
I haven't tested this on fsdax filesystem. Only tested on xfs with
various bs.
>
>> +setup
>> +echo -e "EXTSIZE = $EXTSIZE BLOCKSIZE = $BLKSZ\n" >> "$seqres.full"
>> +
>> +NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX=$SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-
>> +
>> +test_empty_file "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"00
>> +test_data_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"01
>> +test_data_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"02
>> +test_truncate_allocated "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"03
>> +test_truncate_delayed "$NEW_FILE_NAME_PREFIX"04
>> +
>> +status=0
>> +exit
>> diff --git a/tests/generic/365.out b/tests/generic/365.out
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..38cd0885
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/generic/365.out
>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>> +QA output created by 365
>> +TEST: Set extsize on empty file
>> +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00
>> +e flag set
>> +Re-setting extsize hint to 0
>> +[0] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-00
>> +e flag unset
>> +
>> +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with delayed allocation
>> +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01: Invalid argument
>> +[0] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-01
>> +e flag unset
>> +
>> +TEST: Set extsize on non-empty file with allocated extents
>> +xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02: Invalid argument
>> +[0] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-02
>> +e flag unset
>> +
>> +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with allocated extents
>> +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-03
>> +e flag set
>> +
>> +TEST: Set extsize after truncating a file with delayed allocation
>> +[EXTSIZE] SCRATCH_MNT/new-file-04
>> +e flag set
>> +
>> --
>> 2.43.5
>>
>>
--
---
Nirjhar Roy
Linux Kernel Developer
IBM, Bangalore
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-25 6:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-22 19:26 [PATCH 0/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] common/xfs,xfs/207: Adding a common helper function to check xflag bits on a given file Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-24 18:08 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 2:56 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-25 4:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 4:15 ` Zorro Lang
2024-10-25 5:27 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 6:17 ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-25 6:16 ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-25 6:14 ` Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-22 19:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] generic: Addition of new tests for extsize hints Nirjhar Roy
2024-10-24 18:14 ` Darrick J. Wong
2024-10-25 6:12 ` Nirjhar Roy [this message]
2024-11-14 9:45 ` Nirjhar Roy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3376b6e7-9870-46dc-a22d-9879ec4d9c09@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nirjhar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=zlang@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).