* Practical partition/volume size limitation
@ 2010-02-09 18:32 Chris Puttick
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Chris Puttick @ 2010-02-09 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-ext4
Hi all
Sorry to intrude and please feel free to redirect me to another more
appropriate list or alternative source (which I have been unable to
find). We're considering a large-scale filestore deployment (starting
with 32TB, single volume) and some team members have concerns about
the practical scalability of ext4 e.g. time to run fsck.
So some questions :)
Are there any examples of organisations running ext4 with large-scale
filestores? What sort of sizes? What issues, if any, have been
encountered? And if not ext4, what else (assuming a Linux preference)?
Thanks in advance.
Chris Puttick
--
My employers website: http://thehumanjourney.net - opinions in this
email are however very much my own and may not reflect that of my
current employer, past employers, associates, friends, family, pets etc..
Documents attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format:
http://iso26300.info
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2010-02-09 18:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-09 18:32 Practical partition/volume size limitation Chris Puttick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).