linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: pagefault in generic_file_buffered_write() causing deadlock
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 10:16:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <455B5990.7080808@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061115090005.c9ec6db5.akpm@osdl.org>

Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:57:45 -0800
> Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> We are looking at a customer situation (on 2.6.16-based distro) - where
>> system becomes almost useless while running some java & stress tests.
>>
>> Root cause seems to be taking a pagefault in generic_file_buffered_write
>> () after calling prepare_write. I am wondering 
>>
>> 1) Why & How this can happen - since we made sure to fault the user
>> buffer before prepare write.
>>     
>
> When using writev() we only fault in the first segment of the iovec.  If
> the second or succesive segment isn't mapped into pagetables we're
> vulnerable to the deadlock.
>   

Yes. I remember this change. Thank you.
>   
>> 2) If this is already fixed in current mainline (I can't see how).
>>     
>
> It was fixed in 2.6.17.
>
> You'll need 6527c2bdf1f833cc18e8f42bd97973d583e4aa83 and
> 81b0c8713385ce1b1b9058e916edcf9561ad76d6
>   
I will try to get this change into customer :(

Thanks,
Badari

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-15 18:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-15 15:57 pagefault in generic_file_buffered_write() causing deadlock Badari Pulavarty
2006-11-15 17:00 ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-15 18:16   ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
2006-11-15 18:20   ` Badari Pulavarty
2006-11-15 19:29     ` Andrew Morton
2006-11-15 20:39       ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=455B5990.7080808@us.ibm.com \
    --to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).