linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
To: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>
Cc: "Amit K. Arora" <aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, suparna@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Extent overlap bugfix in ext4
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:23:13 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <459D4611.3090707@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3hcv7f6r2.fsf@bzzz.home.net>

Alex Tomas wrote:
>>>>>>Mingming Cao (MC) writes:
> 
> 
>  MC> But the bug Amit pointed here is unrelated to the code convert
>  MC> uninitialized blocks to initialized ones. Rather, it's related to do
>  MC> multiple block allocation across on a window with parts already have
>  MC> blocks allocated. Without the check, the current code just simply
>  MC> allocate the requested extent and insert it into the tree which might
>  MC> overlap with existing extent.
> 
> correct. thanks for catching. in delayed allocation patch
> get_blocks() isn't used and ext4_ext_walk_space() works
> right in this case.
> 

Yep, I realized that yesterday. That explains we never see this overlap 
problem when we testing extent+delalloc+mballoc last year.

  ext4_ext_walk_space did almost all the overlap check.  I think we 
could reuse that code.

Mingming
> thanks, Alex
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-04 18:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-02  9:09 [PATCH 1/1] Extent overlap bugfix in ext4 Amit K. Arora
2007-01-02  9:25 ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-02  9:47   ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-03  9:44     ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-03 18:07       ` Mingming Cao
2007-01-04  8:13         ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04 10:04         ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-04 18:23           ` Mingming Cao [this message]
2007-01-03  1:35 ` Mingming Cao
2007-01-03  6:06   ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04  8:54     ` [PATCH 1/1 version2] " Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04 10:25       ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-04 11:16         ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04 10:39       ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-04 11:27         ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04 11:37           ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-04 17:23             ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04 18:50               ` Mingming Cao
2007-01-04 19:19                 ` Alex Tomas
2007-01-05 12:13                 ` Amit K. Arora
2007-01-09  5:51                   ` [PATCH 1/1 version3] " Amit K. Arora
2007-01-04 19:03               ` [PATCH 1/1 version2] " Alex Tomas
2007-01-04 19:47                 ` Mingming Cao
2007-01-05  6:18                   ` Amit K. Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=459D4611.3090707@us.ibm.com \
    --to=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=aarora@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).