From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] btrfs-progs: convert: support ext2 unwritten file data extents
Date: Sat, 4 May 2024 07:53:26 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <459ec128-eddd-4575-ab28-788f340a6a7c@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b5107fa-bcce-46dd-950b-775695d872e6@oracle.com>
在 2024/5/3 21:55, Anand Jain 写道:
[...]
>>> +int find_prealloc(struct blk_iterate_data *data, int index, bool
>>> *prealloc)
>>
>> This function is called for every file extent we're going to create.
>> I'm not a big fan of doing so many lookup.
>>
>> My question is, is this the only way to determine the flag of the data
>> extent?
>>
>> My instinct says there should be a straight forward way to determine
>> if a file extent is preallocated or not, just like what we do in our
>> file extent items.
>
>
>> Thus during the ext2fs_block_iterate2(), there should be some way to
>> tell if a block is preallocated or not.
>
> Unfortunately, the callback doesn't provide the extent flags. Unless, I
> miss something?
You're right, the iterator interface does not provide any extra info.
And I also checked the kernel implementation, they have extra
ext4_map_blocks() to do the resolve, and then ext4_es_lookup_extent() to
determine if it's unwritten.
So I'm afraid we have to go this solution.
Meanwhile related to the implementation, can we put the prealloc flat
into blk_iterate_data?
So that we can handle different fses' preallocated extents in a more
common way.
Thanks,
Qu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1714722726.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <6d2a19ced4551bfcf2a5d841921af7f84c4ea950.1714722726.git.anand.jain@oracle.com>
2024-05-03 9:37 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] btrfs-progs: convert: support ext2 unwritten file data extents Qu Wenruo
2024-05-03 12:25 ` Anand Jain
2024-05-03 22:23 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-05-03 23:27 ` Anand Jain
2024-05-04 0:06 ` Qu Wenruo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=459ec128-eddd-4575-ab28-788f340a6a7c@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox