public inbox for linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cordenner jean noel <jean-noel.cordenner@bull.net>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/3] i_version update for ext4
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:12:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B76961.7030509@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070123184611.GF5236@schatzie.adilger.int>

Andreas Dilger a écrit :
> On Jan 23, 2007  18:23 +0100, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
>> I've updated what was previously the change attribute patch for ext4 
>> initially posted by Alexandre Ratchov. The previous patch was 
>> introducing a change_attribute field, now it uses the i_version field of 
>> the inode.
>>
>> The i_version field is a counter that is set on every inode creation and 
>> that is incremented every time the inode data is modified (similarly to 
>> the "ctime" time-stamp).
>> The aim is to fulfill NFSv4 requirements for rfc3530.
>> For the moent, the counter is only a 32bit value but it is planned to be 
>> 64bit as required.
>>
>> The patch is divided into 3 parts, the vfs layer, the ext4 specific code 
>> and an user part to check i_version changes via stat.
> 
> Have you had a chance to look at the performance impact of this change
> (possible with oprofile)?  Always marking the inodes dirty for ext3
> may have some noticable overhead.
>

I did some tests using fileop with the previous version of the patch 
which was very similar. I was surprised that there was no noticable 
overhead:
  http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/change_attribute/index.html

I will use oprofile to check it again.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-24 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-23 17:23 [RFC] [patch 0/3] i_version update for ext4 Cordenner jean noel
2007-01-23 18:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-01-24 14:12   ` Cordenner jean noel [this message]
2007-01-24 17:40     ` Mingming Cao
2007-01-24 18:06       ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-01-24 18:12       ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45B76961.7030509@bull.net \
    --to=jean-noel.cordenner@bull.net \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox