From: Cordenner jean noel <jean-noel.cordenner@bull.net>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch 0/3] i_version update for ext4
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:12:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45B76961.7030509@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070123184611.GF5236@schatzie.adilger.int>
Andreas Dilger a écrit :
> On Jan 23, 2007 18:23 +0100, Cordenner jean noel wrote:
>> I've updated what was previously the change attribute patch for ext4
>> initially posted by Alexandre Ratchov. The previous patch was
>> introducing a change_attribute field, now it uses the i_version field of
>> the inode.
>>
>> The i_version field is a counter that is set on every inode creation and
>> that is incremented every time the inode data is modified (similarly to
>> the "ctime" time-stamp).
>> The aim is to fulfill NFSv4 requirements for rfc3530.
>> For the moent, the counter is only a 32bit value but it is planned to be
>> 64bit as required.
>>
>> The patch is divided into 3 parts, the vfs layer, the ext4 specific code
>> and an user part to check i_version changes via stat.
>
> Have you had a chance to look at the performance impact of this change
> (possible with oprofile)? Always marking the inodes dirty for ext3
> may have some noticable overhead.
>
I did some tests using fileop with the previous version of the patch
which was very similar. I was surprised that there was no noticable
overhead:
http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/change_attribute/index.html
I will use oprofile to check it again.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-24 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-23 17:23 [RFC] [patch 0/3] i_version update for ext4 Cordenner jean noel
2007-01-23 18:46 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-01-24 14:12 ` Cordenner jean noel [this message]
2007-01-24 17:40 ` Mingming Cao
2007-01-24 18:06 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-01-24 18:12 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45B76961.7030509@bull.net \
--to=jean-noel.cordenner@bull.net \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox