From: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@bull.net>
To: cmm@us.ibm.com
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: qla2xxx BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:22:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45F57034.2020402@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1173297911.3769.3.camel@dyn9047017103.beaverton.ibm.com>
Mingming Cao wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 11:45 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 18:09:55 +0100 Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:37:22 +0100 Andre Noll <maan@systemlinux.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>> BTW: Are ext3 filesystem sizes greater than 8T now officially
>>> supported?
>> I think so, but I don't know how much 16TB testing developers and
>> distros are doing - perhaps the linux-ext4 denizens can tell us?
>> -
>
> IBM has done some testing (dbench, fsstress, fsx, tiobench, iozone etc)
> on 10TB ext3, I think RedHat and BULL have done similar test on >8TB
> ext3 too.
>
> Mingming
Is there not a problem of backward-compatibility with old kernels?
Doesn't we need to handle a new INCOMPAT flag in e2fsprogs and kernel
before allowing ext3 filesystems greater than 8T?
Valérie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-12 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070226133153.GC4095@skl-net.de>
[not found] ` <20070226182617.GC9968@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local>
[not found] ` <20070227101100.GA22572@skl-net.de>
[not found] ` <20070227185134.GJ20397@andrew-vasquezs-computer.local>
[not found] ` <20070228151829.GI22572@skl-net.de>
[not found] ` <20070228153722.GJ22572@skl-net.de>
[not found] ` <20070306203952.471218df.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20070307170955.GA4252@skl-net.de>
2007-03-07 19:45 ` qla2xxx BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic Andrew Morton
2007-03-07 20:05 ` Mingming Cao
2007-03-09 9:36 ` Andre Noll
2007-03-12 15:22 ` Valerie Clement [this message]
2007-03-13 7:01 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-03-13 8:23 ` Valerie Clement
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45F57034.2020402@bull.net \
--to=valerie.clement@bull.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maan@systemlinux.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox