From: Alex Tomas <alex@clusterfs.com>
To: Valerie Clement <valerie.clement@bull.net>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Large File Deletion Comparison (ext3, ext4, XFS)
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:51:26 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4632462E.7090109@clusterfs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4631FD7F.9030008@bull.net>
Valerie Clement wrote:
> As asked by Alex, I included in the test results the file fragmentation
> level and the number of I/Os done during the file deletion.
>
> Here are the results obtained with a not very fragmented 100-GB file:
>
> | ext3 ext4 + extents xfs
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> nb of fragments | 796 798 15
> elapsed time | 2m0.306s 0m11.127s 0m0.553s
> |
> blks read | 206600 6416 352
> blks written | 13592 13064 104
> ------------------------------------------------------------
hmm. if I did math right, then, in theory, 100GB file could be
placed using ~850 extents: 100 * 1024 / 120, where 120 is amount
of data one can allocate in regular group. 850 extents would
require 3 leaf blocks (340 extents/block) + 1 index block. we'd
need to read these 4 blocks + all 850 involved bitmaps + some
blocks of group descriptors. so, probably we need to tune balloc.
then we'd improve remove time by factor six (6400 blocks to read
vs. ~900-1000 blocks to read) ?
thanks, Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-27 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-27 13:41 Large File Deletion Comparison (ext3, ext4, XFS) Valerie Clement
2007-04-27 18:33 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-27 20:33 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-27 18:51 ` Alex Tomas [this message]
2007-04-27 20:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-27 20:48 ` Alex Tomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4632462E.7090109@clusterfs.com \
--to=alex@clusterfs.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=valerie.clement@bull.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).