From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ext4 Patch Queue using stgit.
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 19:55:00 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <464DB73C.1080806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179494580.15044.8.camel@kleikamp.austin.ibm.com>
Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 18:12 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I was looking at ext4 patch queue and was wondering why we are putting
>> .patch under git. If we are looking for a quilt like functionality, one
>> can achieve the same using stgit. I was using stgit to maintain a set of
>> patches before. So if you look at
>>
>> http://git.openssi.org/~kvaneesh/gitweb.cgi?p=ci-to-linus.git;a=summary
>>
>> you will see the patches i was working on with linus tree as from-linus.
>> Now to find out what changes were made to these patches during the
>> development one can look at the tracking branch. In the above case the
>> latest tracking branch was 2.6.20-rc1-ci-to-linus
>>
>> http://git.openssi.org/~kvaneesh/gitweb.cgi?h=2.6.20-rc1-ci-to-linus;p=ci-to-linus.git;a=shortlog
>>
>> Other tracking branches at different development stages can be found at
>> http://git.openssi.org/~kvaneesh/gitweb.cgi?p=ci-to-linus.git;a=heads
>>
>>
>> This make looking at the diff much easier. diff of .patch does seems to
>> be useful.
>
> Does _not_ seem to be useful?
>
yes. that was a typo
> I agree that I find the current setup a little awkward. The git tree
> isn't something we can point Andrew or Linus to. It has to be extracted
> to another place for that. We really should have some of these patches
> in mainline by now, and that's not getting done.
>
> I haven't looked at stgit, so I don't have an opinion on using it as an
> alternative, but I'm open to the idea.
>
>> Only problem i can think of is how multiple people will push to the same
>> repo.
>
> If we continue to host on repo.or.cz, Ted can allow anyone he wants to
> push to the tree.
>
The problem is stgit management of git repo is local to the user. That
means the stgit commands like push, pop and refresh works on local repo.
I am not sure how easily this mode of operation can be replicated
across different user. There will be a slight overhead on each developer
side when somebody else does a git push and later the developer does a
pull. He/she will have to update the patcheset that is being managed by
stgit by hand.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-18 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 12:42 Ext4 Patch Queue using stgit Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-05-18 13:23 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-05-18 14:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2007-05-18 16:06 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-18 17:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=464DB73C.1080806@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox