linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Coly Li <coyli@suse.de>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e2fsprogs: remove fragment support (V3)
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:33:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46BF3656.4010108@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070812033129.GB21719@thunk.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1866 bytes --]

Theodore,

Another question of mine is for the .po files: Once I modify a string from _(""), should I mofify
all the corresponded strings from all .po files ?

Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 01:13:39AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> If you're going to use PGP signatures, please use the MIME-PGP that
> doesn't cause annoying quoting to take place, i.e.:
> 
>> - -   switch (os) {
>> - -       case EXT2_OS_HURD:
>> - -           frag = inode->osd2.hurd2.h_i_frag;
> 
Oops, I thought that issues from my email client. OK, next time when I send patch I will use MIME-PGP.


> Also, please take a look at my recent patch series to remove support
> for PPC big-endian byte-swapped filesystems.  Separate patches which
> makes it obvious what is being removed and makes it easy to review are
> much appreciated.
> 

Sure, I agree with you.


> In addition, for now, I'd like to keep the code which checks the
> remaining fragment fields in the inode and superblock since they act
> as a safety check to make sure the filesystem is sane and we don't
> have garbage there.  The checksum fields will obviate this need, but
> keeping the checks there for ext2/ext3 filesystems seem like a good
> idea.

My idea is:
1) Modify names of related fields of superblock and inode. to avoid others using these field in future.
2) Keep checking code for the modified fields. to make source code robust.

> 
> Dropping the union is probably fine, since at this point it looks
> pretty clear that both the Hurd and Masix is dead.  But let's do the
> cleanups a little at a time, and I'd probably start with just removing
> the cruft from the mke2fs options and man pages.
> 

Sure, I agree with you :-)

> Regards,
> 
>     	       	   	  	      - Ted

-- 
Coly Li
SuSE PRC Labs


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-12 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-10 17:13 [PATCH] e2fsprogs: remove fragment support (V3) Coly Li
2007-08-10 18:45 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-08-12 16:24   ` Coly Li
2007-08-12  3:31 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-12 16:33   ` Coly Li [this message]
2007-08-12 21:29     ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-12 21:59       ` Coly Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46BF3656.4010108@suse.de \
    --to=coyli@suse.de \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).