linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Avantika Mathur <mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:25:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4703E5B1.7090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071003183718.GM5578@schatzie.adilger.int>



Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 03, 2007  15:30 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> +	if (block_group == sbi->s_gdb_count - 1) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * Even though mke2fs always initialize first and last group
>> +		 * if some other tool enabled the EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT we 
>> need
>> +		 * to make sure we calculate the right free blocks
>> +		 */
>> +		free_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) -
>> +				le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
>> +				(EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * 
>> sbi->s_groups_count) -
>> +				bit_max;
> 
> Did you verify that subtracting s_first_data_block is indeed the right
> thing to do.  I _think_ yes, but I didn't look at it very closely when
> I wrote it late last night.
> 

yes s_first_data_block is always decremented to find total number of blocks occupied by the 
reset of the group. But now looking at it again i guess i need to have 

EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) *  sbi->s_groups_count

as

EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) *  (sbi->s_groups_count -1 )


Also for the last group i need to mark_end_bitmap_end from a lower value. 

if ( last_group) {
group_block = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) - e32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
              EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * (sbi->s_groups_count - 1)

} else {
 group_block = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)

}


free_blocks = group_block - bit_max


mark_bitmap_end(group_block, ...)


-aneesh

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-03 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-03 10:00 update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-03 18:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-03 18:55   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2007-10-03 19:04     ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-04  0:44       ` Mingming Cao
2007-10-05 13:26 ` Valerie Clement
2007-10-05 15:14   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4703E5B1.7090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).