From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: Avantika Mathur <mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 00:25:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4703E5B1.7090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071003183718.GM5578@schatzie.adilger.int>
Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 03, 2007 15:30 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> + if (block_group == sbi->s_gdb_count - 1) {
>> + /*
>> + * Even though mke2fs always initialize first and last group
>> + * if some other tool enabled the EXT4_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT we
>> need
>> + * to make sure we calculate the right free blocks
>> + */
>> + free_blocks = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) -
>> + le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
>> + (EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) *
>> sbi->s_groups_count) -
>> + bit_max;
>
> Did you verify that subtracting s_first_data_block is indeed the right
> thing to do. I _think_ yes, but I didn't look at it very closely when
> I wrote it late last night.
>
yes s_first_data_block is always decremented to find total number of blocks occupied by the
reset of the group. But now looking at it again i guess i need to have
EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * sbi->s_groups_count
as
EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * (sbi->s_groups_count -1 )
Also for the last group i need to mark_end_bitmap_end from a lower value.
if ( last_group) {
group_block = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es) - e32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block) -
EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb) * (sbi->s_groups_count - 1)
} else {
group_block = EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)
}
free_blocks = group_block - bit_max
mark_bitmap_end(group_block, ...)
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-03 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 10:00 update uninitialized-block-groups.patch and mballoc-core.patch Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-03 18:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-03 18:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2007-10-03 19:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2007-10-04 0:44 ` Mingming Cao
2007-10-05 13:26 ` Valerie Clement
2007-10-05 15:14 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4703E5B1.7090903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathur@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).