linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Tomas <alex.tomas@sun.com>
Subject: Re: delalloc fragmenting files?
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:01:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4728ED3B.1060407@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071026221938.GV3042@webber.adilger.int>

Andreas Dilger wrote:
> One of the issues is that w/o delalloc the mballoc code only gets 
> single-block allocations, so there might be a problem with the interface
> to mballoc.  That might be caused by the fact the patches were changed
> at one point from delalloc-atop-mballoc to mballoc-atop-delalloc, and
> something was missed in that conversion.

I've been testing this with a 16x1MB buffered dd to a fresh filesystem;
it gets 7 extents, and out of order.  :(

First block: 37120
Last block: 63427
Discontinuity: Block 1024 is at 38400 (was 38143)
Discontinuity: Block 1036 is at 57344 (was 38411)
Discontinuity: Block 2048 is at 38412 (was 58355)
Discontinuity: Block 2072 is at 61440 (was 38435)
Discontinuity: Block 3072 is at 38436 (was 62439)
Discontinuity: Block 3108 is at 62440 (was 38471)
/mnt/test/testfile: 7 extents found

One thing that seems to be happening is that thanks to delalloc, a nice
big request is coming in (only 1036 blocks of the 4096, not quite sure
why), but then it gets into ext4_mb_normalize_request(), which finds the
most blocks it can "preallocate" is 256, and chops down the request to
256 blocks.  Shouldn't this preallocation be over & above what was asked
for, vs. reducing the request?

Ok, so, we get allocations in 256-block chunks...  Why they don't all
come out contiguous, I don't know yet...

-Eric

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-31 21:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-26 21:24 delalloc fragmenting files? Eric Sandeen
2007-10-26 22:19 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-10-27  2:54   ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-27  3:08     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-31 21:01   ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2007-11-01  0:35     ` Alex Tomas
2007-11-01 15:20       ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-01 19:05         ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-02  8:56           ` Alex Tomas
2007-11-02 15:41             ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-04 18:36               ` Alex Tomas
2007-11-05 17:37                 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-05 17:39                   ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-05 17:45                   ` Alex Tomas
2007-11-05 18:51                   ` Andreas Dilger
2007-11-05 18:54                     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-06 19:54                   ` Eric Sandeen
2007-11-07 20:37                     ` Andreas Dilger
2007-11-07 20:53                       ` Eric Sandeen
2007-10-29 19:13 ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4728ED3B.1060407@redhat.com \
    --to=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=adilger@sun.com \
    --cc=alex.tomas@sun.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).