From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "Jose R. Santos" <jrs@us.ibm.com>, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][e2fsprogs] Allow user to disable Undo manager through MKE2FS_SCRATCH_DIR
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:44:39 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F97C87.3060603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080406221947.GA13284@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso wrote:
> (This will be merged into the patch "e2fsprogs: Make mke2fs use undo
> I/O manager" before the whole branch gets integrated into the next or
> master branches, using the magic that is git rebase --interactive.
> Also needing fixing is the code to hook into the profile lookup.)
What is the rationale for turning mke2fs into a nanny for
administrators, anyway? Maybe to complete the transformation we should
just make it a gtk application with a windows-like "Are you sure? [Yes]
[No]" alert dialog box that pops up?
Seriously, what does this gain us, other than a slowdown of an
already-slow mkfs? I'm sure there are stories of people who mkfs'd the
wrong device but there are a million sad stories out there; rm -rf /, dd
if=/dev/null of=/dev/sda, fdisk the wrong device, you name it. We can't
save them all. :)
The notion of an (optional) undo IO manager is fine in general, I like
the idea that if I have dicey fsck to do I can in theory recover from it
if it goes badly, though even there I'd personally rather not have it on
by default... (how do I turn it off for fsck?) But mkfs, by default -
really? I don't much like it, and on my boxes I'd like a way to
permanently turn it off, regardless of whether I'm testing or not...
Sure I could put it in my .bashrc or whatnot, but really, what does this
gain us?
-Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-07 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 14:02 [PATCH][e2fsprogs] Allow user to disable Undo manager through MKE2FS_SCRATCH_DIR Jose R. Santos
2008-04-06 22:19 ` Theodore Tso
2008-04-07 1:44 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-04-07 4:20 ` Theodore Tso
2008-04-07 15:02 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F97C87.3060603@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=jrs@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox