From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
To: Nathan Roberts <nroberts@yahoo-inc.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Storing inodes in a separate block device?
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:21:57 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48358F95.4070900@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48358907.3010103@yahoo-inc.com>
Nathan Roberts wrote:
> Has a feature ever been considered (or already exist) for storing inodes
> in a block device separate from the data? Is it even a "reasonable"
> thing to do or are there major pitfalls that one would run into?
XFS has such a thing, although it evolved for slightly different
reasons. The "realtime subvolume" is a data-only volume, with all
metadata on the main block device. It also has some different allocator
characteristics. In practice I don't think it's been used much in the
field on Linux, but ISTR some people have had good luck for some workloads.
> The rationale behind this question comes from use cases where a file
> system is storing very large numbers of files. Reading files in these
> file systems will essentially incur at least two seeks: one for the
> inode, one for the data blocks. If the seek to the inode were more
> efficient, dramatic performance gains could be achieved for such use cases.
>
> Fast seeking devices (such as flash based devices) are becoming much
> more mainstream these days and would seem like a reasonable device for
> the inodes. The $/GB is not as good as disks but it's much better than
> DRAM. For many use cases, the number of these "fast access" inodes that
> would need to be cached in RAM is near 0. So, RAM savings are also a
> potential benefit.
One downside may be flash wear; in a hand-wavy way I could imagine that
data blocks may change less often than metadata in many use casees
(think atimes, directory updates and whatnot). Just a thought.
> I've ran some basic tests using ext4 on a SATA array plus a USB thumb
> drive for the inodes. Even with the slowness of a thumb drive, I was
> able to see encouraging results ( >50% read throughput improvement for a
> mixture of 4K-8K files).
How'd you test this, do you have a patch? Sounds interesting.
Thanks,
-Eric
> I'm interested in hearing thoughts/potential pitfalls/etc.
>
> Nathan
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-22 15:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-22 14:53 Storing inodes in a separate block device? Nathan Roberts
2008-05-22 15:21 ` Eric Sandeen [this message]
2008-05-22 16:58 ` Nathan Roberts
2008-05-22 16:03 ` Andreas Dilger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48358F95.4070900@redhat.com \
--to=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nroberts@yahoo-inc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox