From: Shen Feng <shen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
Cc: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] ext4: Use inode preallocation with -o noextents
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 11:26:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <484F45C9.3030804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080605182455.GV2961@webber.adilger.int>
Andreas Dilger Wrote:
> On Jun 05, 2008 07:55 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
>>> /**
>>> - * ext4_new_blocks_old() -- core block(s) allocation function
>>> + * ext4_orlov_new_blocks() -- core block(s) allocation function
>> what is orlov means? this is core function for non extent based without
>> mballoc block allocation, right?
>
> Orlov is the name of the INODE allocator, not the block allocator. I'm
> not sure there is a name for the block allocator except "old" or "bitmap".
> In the future I suspect we won't want to keep this version at all, using
> the mballoc allocator even for block-mapped files, but it is useful for
> now for performance comparisons.
>
Is that true?
I got the following from the kernel ext4 documentation.
orlov (*) This enables the new Orlov block allocator. It is
enabled by default.
oldalloc This disables the Orlov block allocator and enables
the old block allocator. Orlov should have better
performance - we'd like to get some feedback if it's
the contrary for you.
-Shen Feng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-11 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-19 20:34 [PATCH -v2] ext4: Use inode preallocation with -o noextents Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-04 2:23 ` Theodore Tso
2008-06-04 4:01 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 3:22 ` Theodore Tso
2008-06-05 8:43 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 14:55 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-05 18:24 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-05 18:46 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-06 21:33 ` Mingming Cao
2008-06-11 3:26 ` Shen Feng [this message]
2008-06-12 9:34 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-12 13:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2008-06-11 3:44 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-16 3:41 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-17 9:42 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-17 10:48 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-18 1:43 ` Shen Feng
2008-06-05 15:37 ` Theodore Tso
2008-06-05 18:28 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-05 19:12 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2008-06-05 20:58 ` Andreas Dilger
2008-06-06 16:26 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=484F45C9.3030804@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=shen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).