From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: kerneloops.org: 2.6.26-rc possible regression in ext3 Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 08:18:39 -0700 Message-ID: <485A78CF.7050401@linux.intel.com> References: <4859F075.2050207@linux.intel.com> <21d7e9970806182242na130e47i85839c4550b4ba03@mail.gmail.com> <20080619081146.GC17630@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> <485A61B5.90003@linux.intel.com> <20080619151016.GA2721@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Airlie , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:15248 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750867AbYFSPSw (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:18:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080619151016.GA2721@cs181133002.pp.htv.fi> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 06:40:05AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> Adrian Bunk wrote: >>> Expect a lot more of this to pop up in the future. >>> Should we #error for gcc 4.3.1? >> it/s better to find if the gcc guys made a testcase for this bug (they normally do) and >> test based on that. > > The gcc Bugzilla contains a testcase. > > But how do you plan to integrate it into a kernel build? we already have several of these. Just look at scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh for an example of such a beast.